ReviewCanadian journal of respiratory therapy : CJRT = Revue canadienne de la therapie respiratoire : RCTR2023
Use of video laryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy as a teaching tool for neonatal intubation: A systematic review.
Review in Canadian journal of respiratory therapy : CJRT = Revue canadienne de la therapie respiratoire : RCTR, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- 2025 Korean Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: Part 9. Neonatal resuscitation.Clinical and experimental emergency medicine · 2026Guideline
- Videolaryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for teaching direct laryngoscopy skills: a systematic review and meta-analysis.British journal of anaesthesia · 2025Pooled it
- Comparison of video laryngoscopy with direct laryngoscopy in critically ill patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.European journal of medical research · 2025Pooled it
- Neonatal endotracheal intubation: development of a comprehensive educational program for procedural skills.Pediatric research · 2026Review
- Tiny airways, high stakes: What every clinician should know about infant airway management in 2025.Indian journal of anaesthesia · 2025Article
- Video Laryngoscopes in Simulated Neonatal Intubation: Usability Study.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Continuous improvement of non-emergent neonatal intubations in a level IV NICU.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2025Article
- Approaches to neonatal intubation training: A scoping review.Resuscitation plus · 2024Article
- Endotracheal Intubation Outside the Operating Room: Year in Review 2023.Respiratory care · 2024Review
- Video laryngoscopy as the standard of care for pediatric intubation-the time is now.Translational pediatrics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Endotracheal intubation and positive pressure ventilation following delivery are required in 32.9% of neonates <31 weeks gestational age and in 5.9% of older newborn babies [1]. Competency in intubation is important, yet opportunities for learners to develop this skill in the clinical environment are limited. Direct laryngoscopy (DL) provides a direct view of the airway during intubation. Unfortunately, visualization of the airway is only available to the primary operator, preventing supervising instructors from simultaneously viewing the airway and allowing them to provide real-time feedback to learners. Video laryngoscopy (VL) is a specialized clinical instrument that utilizes an indirect view of the airway that is digitally projected onto a screen via camera, which allows multiple simultaneous viewers to view the airway during intubation attempts and permits instructors to provide real-time feedback to learners accordingly. Objectives: This systematic review explores whether VL-supported learning is superior to DL for the development of skill in neonatal intubation. Methods: Systematic searches of MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and the Cochrane Library were conducted without language restrictions. Studies published between January 2011 and November 2021 were examined. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the effectiveness of VL versus DL for supporting neonatal intubation learning were included. Rate of successful intubation was the primary outcome measure. Both authors independently extracted study data and conducted risk of bias assessment. Results: Four RCTs met the inclusion criteria, with two incorporating crossover designs. Each examined the effectiveness of VL versus DL, with concurrent supervisor support, as a tool for learning neonatal intubation in medical residents. All studies reported significantly higher intubation success rates with VL. Conclusion: VL and real-time supervisor feedback is a more effective tool for supporting the development of neonatal intubation skill, compared with DL. Future investigations should include learners from other professions whose scope of practice includes neonatal intubation (eg, respiratory therapists).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.