ArticleCureus2023
Operative Hysteroscopy Versus Levonorgestrel-Releasing Intrauterine System (LNG-IUS) Insertion: A Prospective Observational Study on the Effect of Surgical and Medical Treatments on Sexual Functions in Women With Abnormal Uterine Bleeding.
Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
- The effect of heavy menstrual bleeding on sexual quality of life: a case-control study.Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background This study aims to evaluate the effect of operative hysteroscopy and levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) insertion for abnormal uterine bleeding on sexual function and, if it improves sexual function, to examine differences in sexual function between women undergoing hysteroscopy and women using LNG-IUS. Methods Ninety women aged between 25 and 52 enrolled in the study. Participants were divided into two groups, including 45 operative hysteroscopy patients and 45 LNG-IUS patients. All patients completed the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) questionnaire pre-treatment and after three months post-treatment. Pre- and post-treatment FSFI scores were compared both within and between groups. Results The mean FSFI scores at three months following both treatments were significantly higher than baseline in both groups (p<0.05). When the two groups were compared, no significant difference was observed between baseline and three-month post-treatment differences in FSFI scores except for the pain domain. In the pain domain of the FSFI questionnaire, a more significant improvement was found in the LNG - IUS inserted group compared to the operative hysteroscopy group. Conclusion Patients had improvement in sexual functions after both operative hysteroscopy and LNG - IUS insertion treatment. No significant difference was observed in hysteroscopy and LNG-IUS patients after both treatments in terms of sexual function according to scores calculated by FSFI, except for the pain domain. Significant improvement was observed in the pain domain of the FSFI for the LNG - IUS inserted group compared to the operative hysteroscopy group, thus demonstrating a significant effect and improvement for dyspareunia and chronic pelvic pain complaint in the LNG-IUS inserted group.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.