Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37056522›Full record

ArticleCureus2023

CURB-65 and Long-Term Mortality of Community-Acquired Pneumonia: A Retrospective Study on Hospitalized Patients.

Pedro Carlos, Ricardo Gomes, Joana Coelho, Catarina Chaves, Célia Tuna, Marlene Louro

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Towards a holistic approach to pulmonary infections. Insights from the Sixth Annual Meeting of Spanish Experts 2024.Revista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Pedro CarlosInternal Medicine Department, Centro Hospitalar Universitário Cova da Beira, Covilhã, PRT.
Ricardo GomesInternal Medicine Department, Centro Hospitalar Universitário Cova da Beira, Covilhã, PRT.
Joana CoelhoInternal Medicine Department, Centro Hospitalar Universitário Cova da Beira, Covilhã, PRT.
Catarina ChavesEndocrinology Department, Centro Hospitalar Tâmega e Sousa, Penafiel, PRT.
Célia TunaInternal Medicine Department, Centro Hospitalar Universitário Cova da Beira, Covilhã, PRT.
Marlene LouroInternal Medicine Department, Centro Hospitalar Universitário Cova da Beira, Covilhã, PRT.
Centro Hospitalar do Tâmega e Sousa · PTHospital Center of Cova da Beira · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Community-acquired pneumonia remains a significant factor in global mortality. Several clinical scoring models are used for predicting pneumonia severity and mortality, aiding in the clinical decision relative to the therapeutic approach, including the CURB-65 score. However, currently, no models exist to identify high-risk patients relative to long-term prognosis when recent evidence reveals a significantly higher mortality rate in the first year after community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) hospitalization. Purpose of the study The purpose of this study is to evaluate the application of the CURB-65 scoring model in our population and examine its potential to predict prognosis and subsequent mortality 6 months after hospitalization. Other potential factors influencing mortality during and after hospitalization were characterized: patient demographics, nosocomial infections, readmissions, and identified pathogens. Study design We conducted a retrospective observational study, enrolling 130 patients admitted with a diagnosis of CAP in the department of internal medicine of Centro Hospitalar Universitário Cova da Beira between January and December of 2018. Consultation of electronic medical records was used to calculate the CURB-65 score on admission at the first hospitalization by CAP, categorizing patients into five risk groups. Mortality and readmission were evaluated after 30, 90, and 180 days. Key results High-risk patients (CURB>2) accounted for 96.9% of our study population. Inpatient mortality of 13%, increasing to 21.5% after six months, was similar to previous studies and was correlated to the CURB-65 score on admission. A microbiologic agent was identified in 37% of cases, with 53% isolates of Streptococcus (S.) pneumoniae. Conclusions Identifying high-risk patients is important for more individualized healthcare and management. The CURB-65 score, only validated for a short-term (30 days) prediction, demonstrates a potential to also predict mortality and rehospitalization in the six-month period after hospitalization, as supported by our findings and previous studies.

Indexed as

classificationcommunity acquired pneumoniamortalityprognosisretrospective observational study

Identifiers

PMID37056522
PMCPMC10089637
OpenAlexW4323975897

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.