ArticleJournal of Cancer2023
Focal Boundary Dice: Improved Breast Tumor Segmentation from MRI Scan.
Article in Journal of Cancer, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Focal Boundary Dice, a new segmentation evaluation measure, was hereby presented, with the focus on boundary quality and class imbalance. Extensive analysis was carried out across different error types with varied object sizes of imaged tumors from Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) scans, and the results show that Focal Boundary Dice is significantly more adaptive than the standard Focal and Dice measures to boundary errors for imaged tumors from MRI scans and does not over-penalize errors on the division of the boundary, including smaller imaged objects. Based on Boundary Dice, the standard evaluation protocols for tumor segmentation tasks were updated by proposing the Focal Boundary Dice. The contradiction between the target and the background area, and the conflict between the importance and the attention of boundary features were mainly solved. Meanwhile, a boundary attention module was introduced to further extract the tumor edge features. The new quality measure presents several desirable characteristics, including higher accuracy in the selection of hard samples, prediction/ground-truth pairs, and balanced responsiveness with across scales, which jointly make it more suitable for segmentation evaluation than other classification-focused measures such as combined Intersection-over-Union and Boundary binary cross-entropy loss, Boundary binary cross-entropy loss and Shape-aware Loss. The experiments show that the new evaluation metrics allow boundary quality improvements and image segmentation accuracy that are generally overlooked by current Dice-based evaluation metrics and deep learning models. It is expected that the adoption of the new boundary-adaptive evaluation metrics will facilitate the rapid progress in segmentation methods, and further contribute to the improvement of classification accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.