Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37056345›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2023

Impact of localized fine tuning in the performance of segmentation and classification of lung nodules from computed tomography scans using deep learning.

Jingwei Cai, Lin Guo, Litong Zhu, Li Xia, Lingjun Qian, Yuan-Ming Fleming Lure, Xiaoping Yin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jingwei CaiRadiology Department, Affiliated Hospital of Hebei University, Baoding, Hebei, China.
Lin GuoShenzhen Zhiying Medical Imaging, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
Litong ZhuDepartment of Medicine, Queen Mary Hospital, University of Hong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Li XiaShenzhen Zhiying Medical Imaging, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
Lingjun QianShenzhen Zhiying Medical Imaging, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
Yuan-Ming Fleming LureShenzhen Zhiying Medical Imaging, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
Xiaoping YinRadiology Department, Affiliated Hospital of Hebei University, Baoding, Hebei, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Algorithm malfunction may occur when there is a performance mismatch between the dataset with which it was developed and the dataset on which it was deployed. Methods: A baseline segmentation algorithm and a baseline classification algorithm were developed using public dataset of Lung Image Database Consortium to detect benign and malignant nodules, and two additional external datasets (i.e., HB and XZ) including 542 cases and 486 cases were involved for the independent validation of these two algorithms. To explore the impact of localized fine tuning on the individual segmentation and classification process, the baseline algorithms were fine tuned with CT scans of HB and XZ datasets, respectively, and the performance of the fine tuned algorithms was tested to compare with the baseline algorithms. Results: The proposed baseline algorithms of both segmentation and classification experienced a drop when directly deployed in external HB and XZ datasets. Comparing with the baseline validation results in nodule segmentation, the fine tuned segmentation algorithm obtained better performance in Dice coefficient, Intersection over Union, and Average Surface Distance in HB dataset (0.593 vs. 0.444; 0.450 vs. 0.348; 0.283 vs. 0.304) and XZ dataset (0.601 vs. 0.486; 0.482 vs. 0.378; 0.225 vs. 0.358). Similarly, comparing with the baseline validation results in benign and malignant nodule classification, the fine tuned classification algorithm had improved area under the receiver operating characteristic curve value, accuracy, and F1 score in HB dataset (0.851 vs. 0.812; 0.813 vs. 0.769; 0.852 vs. 0.822) and XZ dataset (0.724 vs. 0.668; 0.696 vs. 0.617; 0.737 vs. 0.668). Conclusions: The external validation performance of localized fine tuned algorithms outperformed the baseline algorithms in both segmentation process and classification process, which showed that localized fine tuning may be an effective way to enable a baseline algorithm generalize to site-specific use.

Indexed as

classificationlocalized fine tuninglung nodulessegmentationsite-specific use

Identifiers

PMID37056345
PMCPMC10088514

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.