ArticleFrontline gastroenterology2023
JAG consensus statements for training and certification in colonoscopy.
Article in Frontline gastroenterology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- Self-Directed Mikoto Simulator Training for Colonoscopy in Gastroenterology Trainees: An International Multicenter Randomized Trial.Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2026Trial
- Automatic metrics from a new colon phantom can ensure basic competency in colonoscopy.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Observational
- User, expert, and construct validation of a new colonoscopy simulator: correlation with National Endoscopy Database key performance indicators.iGIE : innovation, investigation and insights · 2026Article
- Harmonising Gastroenterology Training: An Analysis of Gastroenterology Training Curricula of the United European Gastroenterology Member Societies.United European gastroenterology journal · 2025Observational
- Numbers matter: How pediatric endoscopy quality varies with annual procedural volume.Journal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition · 2025Article
- Advancing colonoscopy training: tailored strategies and simulation-based models for skill mastery.Clinical endoscopy · 2025Review
- A prospective study on incidence of desaturations in ERCP with non-anesthesiologist sedation and adverse event awareness of endoscopists.Scientific reports · 2025Observational
- Article
- Prospective assessment of learning curve and impact of intensive versus progressive training in colonoscopy competence among French residents.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- A multi-modal training environment for colonoscopy with pressure feedback.Surgical endoscopy · 2025Article
- Do all trainers think the same? Exploring use of the Think Aloud method to understand colonoscopy trainer thought processes.Endoscopy international open · 2025Article
- Is size, morphology, site, and access scoring system consistent between endoscopists? Interobserver and intraobserver polyp assessment study.Endoscopy international open · 2025Article
- Twitter debate: should upper gastrointestinal bleeding training and certification be formalised?Frontline gastroenterology · 2024Article
- Exploring Endoscopic Competence in Gastroenterology Training: A Simulation-Based Comparative Analysis of GAGES, DOPS, and ACE Assessment Tools.Advances in medical education and practice · 2024Article
- Causes of intraprocedural discomfort in colonoscopy: a review and practical tips.Therapeutic advances in gastrointestinal endoscopyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
28 authors at 20 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: In the UK, endoscopy certification is awarded when trainees attain minimum competency standards for independent practice. A national evidence-based review was undertaken to update and develop standards and recommendations for colonoscopy training and certification. Methods: Under the oversight of the Joint Advisory Group (JAG), a modified Delphi process was conducted between 2019 and 2020 with multisociety expert representation. Following literature review and Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations appraisal, recommendation statements on colonoscopy training and certification were formulated and subjected to anonymous voting to obtain consensus. Accepted statements were peer reviewed by JAG and relevant stakeholders for incorporation into the updated colonoscopy certification pathway. Results: In total, 45 recommendation statements were generated under the domains of: definition of competence (13), acquisition of competence (20), assessment of competence (8) and postcertification support (4). The consensus process led to revised criteria for colonoscopy certification, comprising: (1) achieving key performance indicators defined within British Society of Gastroenterology standards (ie, unassisted caecal intubation rate >90%, rectal retroversion >90%, polyp detection rate >15%+, polyp retrieval rate >90%, patient comfort <10% with moderate-severe discomfort); (2) minimum procedure count 280+; (3) performing 15+ procedures over the preceding 3 months; (4) attendance of the JAG Basic Skills in Colonoscopy course; (5) terminal ileal intubation rates of 60%+ in inflammatory bowel disease; (6) satisfying requirements for formative direct observation of procedure skills (DOPS) and direct observation of polypectomy skills (Size, Morphology, Site, Access (SMSA) level 2); (7) evidence of reflective practice as documented on the JAG Endoscopy Training System reflection tool; (8) successful performance in summative DOPS. Conclusion: The UK standards for training and certification in colonoscopy have been updated, culminating in a single-stage certification process with emphasis on polypectomy competency (SMSA Level 2+). These standards are intended to support training, improve standards of colonoscopy and polypectomy, and provide support to the newly independent practitioner.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.