Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37056293›Full record

ArticleEuropean heart journal. Digital health2020

Prediction of coronary artery calcium scoring from surface electrocardiogram in atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: a pilot study.

Peter D Farjo, Naveena Yanamala, Nobuyuki Kagiyama, Heenaben B Patel, Grace Casaclang-Verzosa, Negin Nezarat, Matthew J Budoff, Partho P Sengupta

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European heart journal. Digital health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Adopting artificial intelligence in cardiovascular medicine: a scoping review.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Peter D FarjoDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, West Virginia University Heart and Vascular Institute, 1 Medical Center Drive, Morgantown, WV 26506, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0125-610X
Naveena YanamalaDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, West Virginia University Heart and Vascular Institute, 1 Medical Center Drive, Morgantown, WV 26506, USA.
Nobuyuki KagiyamaDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, West Virginia University Heart and Vascular Institute, 1 Medical Center Drive, Morgantown, WV 26506, USA.
Heenaben B PatelDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, West Virginia University Heart and Vascular Institute, 1 Medical Center Drive, Morgantown, WV 26506, USA.
Grace Casaclang-VerzosaDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, West Virginia University Heart and Vascular Institute, 1 Medical Center Drive, Morgantown, WV 26506, USA.
Negin NezaratDepartment of Medicine, Lundquist Institute, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, 1124 West Carson St, Torrance, CA 90502, USA.
Matthew J BudoffDepartment of Medicine, Lundquist Institute, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, 1124 West Carson St, Torrance, CA 90502, USA.
Partho P SenguptaDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, West Virginia University Heart and Vascular Institute, 1 Medical Center Drive, Morgantown, WV 26506, USA.
West Virginia University · USUCLA Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aims: Coronary artery calcium (CAC) scoring is an established tool for cardiovascular risk stratification. However, the lack of widespread availability and concerns about radiation exposure have limited the universal clinical utilization of CAC. In this study, we sought to explore whether machine learning (ML) approaches can aid cardiovascular risk stratification by predicting guideline recommended CAC score categories from clinical features and surface electrocardiograms. Methods and results: In this substudy of a prospective, multicentre trial, a total of 534 subjects referred for CAC scores and electrocardiographic data were split into 80% training and 20% testing sets. Two binary outcome ML logistic regression models were developed for prediction of CAC scores equal to 0 and ≥400. Both CAC = 0 and CAC ≥400 models yielded values for the area under the curve, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 84%, 92%, 70%, and 75%, and 87%, 91%, 75%, and 81%, respectively. We further tested the CAC ≥400 model to risk stratify a cohort of 87 subjects referred for invasive coronary angiography. Using an intermediate or higher pretest probability (≥15%) to predict CAC ≥400, the model predicted the presence of significant coronary artery stenosis ( Conclusion: ML techniques can extract information from electrocardiographic data and clinical variables to predict CAC score categories and similarly risk-stratify patients with suspected coronary artery disease.

Indexed as

Calcium scoreECGMachine learningPrediction

Identifiers

PMID37056293
PMCPMC10087019
OpenAlexW3109673910

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.