Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37056232›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2023

Use of fermented Chinese medicine residues as a feed additive and effects on growth performance, meat quality, and intestinal health of broilers.

Xinhong Zhou, Shiyi Li, Yilong Jiang, Jicheng Deng, Chuanpeng Yang, Lijuan Kang, Huaidan Zhang, Xianxin Chen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The effects of fermentedFrontiers in veterinary science · 2025
    Article
  11. Frontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Xinhong ZhouLeshan Academy of Agriculture Science, Leshan, Sichuan, China.
Shiyi LiLeshan Academy of Agriculture Science, Leshan, Sichuan, China.
Yilong JiangLeshan Academy of Agriculture Science, Leshan, Sichuan, China.
Jicheng DengLeshan Academy of Agriculture Science, Leshan, Sichuan, China.
Chuanpeng YangLeshan Academy of Agriculture Science, Leshan, Sichuan, China.
Lijuan KangLeshan Academy of Agriculture Science, Leshan, Sichuan, China.
Huaidan ZhangLeshan Academy of Agriculture Science, Leshan, Sichuan, China.
Xianxin ChenLeshan Academy of Agriculture Science, Leshan, Sichuan, China.
Wuhan Academy of Agricultural Sciences · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The purpose of this research was to investigate how dietary supplementation with fermented herbal residues (FCMR) affected birds' development capacity, quality of meat, gut barrier, and cecum microbiota. Methods: 540 cyan-shank partridge birds aged 47 days were chosen and divided into two groups of six replicates each and 45 birds for each replicate. The control group (CON) received a basal diet, while the trial group decreased a basic diet containing 5% FCMR. Results and discussion: The findings revealed that the addition of FCMR decreased FCR and increased ADG in broilers (

Indexed as

broilersfermented Chinese medicine residuesgrowth capacityintestinalmeat quality

Identifiers

PMID37056232
PMCPMC10086232
OpenAlexW4361216545

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.