Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37056208›Full record

ArticleJournal of Zhejiang University. Science. B2023

An expandable chamber for safe brain retraction: new technologies in the field of transcranial endoscopic surgery.

Elena Roca, Anna Gobetti, Giovanna Cornacchia, Oscar Vivaldi, Barbara Buffoli, Giorgio Ramorino

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of Zhejiang University. Science. B, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Elena RocaHead and Neck Department, Neurosurgery, Istituto Ospedaliero Fondazione Poliambulanza, 25124 Brescia, Italy. rocaelena@gmail.com.
Anna GobettiMaterials Science and Technology at Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, University of Brescia, 25123 Brescia, Italy.
Giovanna CornacchiaMetallurgy at Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, University of Brescia, 25123 Brescia, Italy.
Oscar VivaldiHead and Neck Department, Neurosurgery, Istituto Ospedaliero Fondazione Poliambulanza, 25124 Brescia, Italy.
Barbara BuffoliAnatomy and Physiopathology Division, Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, 25123 Brescia, Italy.
Giorgio RamorinoMaterials Science and Technology at Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, University of Brescia, 25123 Brescia, Italy.
University of Brescia · ITFondazione Poliambulanza Istituto Ospedaliero · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neurosurgery is a highly specialized field: it often involves surgical manipulation of noble structures and cerebral retraction is frequently necessary to reach deep-seated brain lesions. There are still no reliable methods preventing possible retraction complications. The objective of this study was to design work chambers well suited for transcranial endoscopic surgery while providing safe retraction of the surrounding brain tissue. The chamber is designed to be inserted close to the intracranial point of interest; once it is best placed it can be opened. This should guarantee an appreciable workspace similar to that of current neurosurgical procedures. The experimental aspect of this study involved the use of a force sensor to evaluate the pressures exerted on the brain tissue during the retraction phase. Following pterional craniotomy, pressure measurements were made during retraction with the use of a conventional metal spatula with different inclinations. Note that, although the force values necessary for retraction and exerted on the spatula by the neurosurgeon are the same, the local pressure exerted on the parenchyma at the edge of the spatula at different inclinations varied greatly. A new method of cerebral retraction using a chamber retractor (CR) has been designed to avoid any type of complication due to spatula edge overpressures and to maintain acceptable pressure values exerted on the parenchyma.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsNeurosurgeryBrainEndoscopyHumansNeurosurgical ProceduresBrain retractionBrain retraction injuryBrain retractor designRetraction complicationSpatulaTranscranial endoscopic surgery

Identifiers

PMID37056208
PMCPMC10106399
OpenAlexW4365483136

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.