Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37056188›Full record

ArticleHua xi kou qiang yi xue za zhi = Huaxi kouqiang yixue zazhi = West China journal of stomatology2023

Construction of a caries diagnosis model based on microbiome novelty score.

Yanfei Sun, Jie Lu, Jiazhen Yang, Yuhan Liu, Lu Liu, Fei Zeng, Yufen Niu, Lei Dong, Fang Yang

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Hua xi kou qiang yi xue za zhi = Huaxi kouqiang yixue zazhi = West China journal of stomatology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 94% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. [Machine learning-based prediction model for caries in the first molars of 9-year-old children in Suzhou].Hua xi kou qiang yi xue za zhi = Huaxi kouqiang yixue zazhi = West China journal of stomatology · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Yanfei SunSchool of Stomatology, Qingdao University, Qingdao 266003, China.
Jie LuDept. of Stomatology, Pujiang Stomatological Hospital, Jinhua 322299, China.
Jiazhen YangDept. of Pediatric Dentistry, Stomatological Hospital of Qingdao, Qingdao 266000, China.
Yuhan LiuCentral Laboratory, Stomatological Hospital of Qing-dao, Qingdao 266000, China.
Lu LiuQingdao Institute of Bioenergy and Bioprocess Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Qingdao 266101, China.
Fei ZengDept. of Stomatology, Affiliated Hospital of Jining Medical University, Jining 272000, China.
Yufen NiuDept. of Pediatric Dentistry, Center of Stomatology, Municipal Hospital, Qingdao 266071, China.
Lei DongDept. of Pediatric Dentistry, Center of Stomatology, Municipal Hospital, Qingdao 266071, China.
Fang YangSchool of Stomatology, Qingdao University, Qingdao 266003, China.
Dalian Medical University · CNQingdao University · CNChinese Academy of Sciences · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study aimed to analyze the bacteria in dental caries and establish an optimized dental-ca-ries diagnosis model based on 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) data of oral flora.

methodsWe searched the public databa-ses of microbiomes including NCBI, MG-RAST, EMBL-EBI, and QIITA and collected data involved in the relevant research on human oral microbiomes worldwide. The samples in the caries dataset (1 703) were compared with healthy ones (20 540) by using the microbial search engine (MSE) to obtain the microbiome novelty score (MNS) and construct a caries diagnosis model based on this index. Nonparametric multivariate ANOVA was used to analyze and compare the impact of different host factors on the oral flora MNS, and the model was optimized by controlling related factors. Finally, the effect of the model was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.

results1) The oral microbiota distribution obviously differed among people with various oral-health statuses, and the species richness and species diversity index decreased. 2) ROC curve was used to evaluate the caries data set, and the area under ROC curve was AUC=0.67. 3) Among the five hosts' factors including caries status, country, age, decayed missing filled tooth (DMFT) indices, and sampling site displayed the strongest effect on MNS of samples (

conclusionsThe model based on the analysis of 16S rRNA data of oral flora had good diagnostic efficiency.

Indexed as

BacteriaDental CariesMicrobiotaChildDental Caries SusceptibilityHumansRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRNA, Ribosomal, 16Sbig-datacarieshigh-throughput sequencingmicrobiomeoral microbiome

Identifiers

PMID37056188
PMCPMC10427253
OpenAlexW4365479309

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.