Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37055940›Full record

ArticleGut microbes

Delay in loop ileostomy reversal surgery does not impact upon post-operative clinical outcomes. Complications are associated with an increased loss of microflora in the defunctioned intestine.

Emma L Beamish, Judith Johnson, Barbara Shih, Rebecca Killick, Frank Dondelinger, Ciarra McGoran, Caitlan Brewster-Craig, Albert Davies, Arnab Bhowmick, Rachael J Rigby

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gut microbes. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07640113 (The STIMIC Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07640113 nanot yet recruitingnot on this map

The STIMIC Trial: A Multicenter Randomized Control Trial Evaluating the Impact of Ambulatory Physiological Stimulation of the Efferent Limb Prior to Ileostomy Closure on Colorectal Microbiota Composition and Histopathological Findings

TypeinterventionalSponsorHospital Clinic of BarcelonaRan2026 to 2028Enrolled90ConditionsIleostomy Stoma, Stoma Stimulation, Microbiome AnalysisArmsSerum stimulation, Physiological stimulation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Emma L BeamishDivision of Biomedical and Life Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medicine, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.
Judith JohnsonRoyal Preston Hospital, Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sharoe Green Lane, Fulwood, Preston, UK.
Barbara ShihDivision of Biomedical and Life Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medicine, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.
Rebecca KillickDepartment of Mathematics & Statistics, Faculty of Science and Technology, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0583-3960
Frank DondelingerCentre for Health Informatics, Computation and Statistics, Faculty of Health and Medicine, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.
Ciarra McGoranDivision of Biomedical and Life Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medicine, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.
Caitlan Brewster-CraigDivision of Biomedical and Life Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medicine, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.
Albert DaviesCentre for Health Informatics, Computation and Statistics, Faculty of Health and Medicine, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.
Arnab BhowmickRoyal Preston Hospital, Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sharoe Green Lane, Fulwood, Preston, UK.
Rachael J RigbyDivision of Biomedical and Life Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medicine, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6605-9609
Lancaster University · GBLancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBFurness General Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Loop ileostomy is a common surgical procedure to allow downstream tissue healing, with the aim of re-joining the bowel approximately 12 months later. The reversal procedure is associated with a substantial morbidity up to 40%. Our previous research demonstrated that defunctioned ileum becomes atrophied, with extensive microbial dysbiosis. This study sought to investigate the potential influence of delaying ileostomy reversal surgery upon both clinical and pathological outcomes. Post-operative clinical data was recorded, including routine blood test results, duration of hospital stay, length of time with stoma and incidence of post-operative complications. We measured ileal fibrosis and atrophy and assessed whether these, or dysbiosis, were impacted by the length of time a stoma was in place, or were linked to clinical outcomes. Associations between clinical data were investigated using scatterplot matrix analysis and t-tests. We found no differences in time between ileostomy formation and reversal in patients experiencing complications vs. individuals with no complications. Furthermore, there were no correlations between days with stoma and pathological measures, such as atrophy or fibrosis, and no ongoing increases in collagen production at the time of reversal surgery. This data suggests that the length of time a stoma is in place does not impact on the likelihood of complications. The incidence of complications is associated with increased loss of microbiota in the defunctioned ileum, but importantly, the decrease in bacteria is not linked to time with stoma. Microbiota diversity in the functional and defunctioned limb correlated within an individual, and was not significantly different between those who experienced complications following surgery vs. those that didn't. Microbiota diversity was also not significantly impacted through delay (>365 days) in stoma reversal. We propose that methods to restore intestinal microbiota numbers, and not necessarily their composition, prior to reversal should be explored to improve the clinical outcomes of ileostomy reversal surgery.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeSurgical StomasDysbiosisHumansIleostomyIntestinescomplicationsdysbiosisileostomyIleusMicrobiotaPost-operativestomaSurgery

Identifiers

PMID37055940
PMCPMC10114987
OpenAlexW4365483062

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.