Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37055860›Full record

ArticleParasites & vectors2023

Experimental feeding of Sergentomyia minuta on reptiles and mammals: comparison with Phlebotomus papatasi.

Lucie Ticha, Vera Volfova, Jairo Alfonso Mendoza-Roldan, Marcos Antonio Bezerra-Santos, Carla Maia, Jovana Sadlova, Domenico Otranto, Petr Volf

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Parasites & vectors, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Targeted Molecular Screening ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Sand Fly Fauna and Prevalence ofTransboundary and emerging diseases · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Lucie TichaDepartment of Parasitology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic. lucie.ticha@natur.cuni.cz.
Vera VolfovaDepartment of Parasitology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
Jairo Alfonso Mendoza-RoldanDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Valenzano, Italy.
Marcos Antonio Bezerra-SantosDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Valenzano, Italy.
Carla MaiaGlobal Health and Tropical Medicine, Instituto de Higiene e Medicina Tropical, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.
Jovana SadlovaDepartment of Parasitology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
Domenico OtrantoDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Valenzano, Italy.
Petr VolfDepartment of Parasitology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.

Funding

Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia, I.P. GHTM-UID/Multi/04413/2013; IF/01302/2015Grantová Agentura, Univerzita Karlova 180220National Institute of virology and bacteriology (Programme EXCELES) - Funded by the European Union - Next Generation EU LX22NPO5103NextGenerationEU-MUR PNRR Extended Partnership initiative on Emerging Infectious Diseases PE00000007, INF-ACT
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSergentomyia minuta (Diptera: Phlebotominae) is an abundant sand fly species in the Mediterranean basin and a proven vector of reptile parasite Leishmania (Sauroleishmania) tarentolae. Although it feeds preferentially on reptiles, blood meal analyses and detection of Leishmania (Leishmania) infantum DNA in wild-caught S. minuta suggest that occasional feeding may occur on mammals, including humans. Therefore, it is currently suspected as a potential vector of human pathogens.

methodsA recently established S. minuta colony was allowed to feed on three reptile species (i.e. lizard Podarcis siculus and geckos Tarentola mauritanica and Hemidactylus turcicus) and three mammal species (i.e. mouse, rabbit and human). Sand fly mortality and fecundity were studied in blood-fed females, and the results were compared with Phlebotomus papatasi, vector of Leishmania (L.) major. Blood meal volumes were measured by haemoglobinometry.

resultsSergentomyia minuta fed readily on three reptile species tested, neglected the mouse and the rabbit but took a blood meal on human. However, the percentage of females engorged on human volunteer was low in cage (3%) and feeding on human blood resulted in extended defecation times, higher post-feeding mortality and lower fecundity. The average volumes of blood ingested by females fed on human and gecko were 0.97 µl and 1.02 µl, respectively. Phlebotomus papatasi females readily fed on mouse, rabbit and human volunteer; a lower percentage of females (23%) took blood meal on the T. mauritanica gecko; reptilian blood increased mortality post-feeding but did not affect P. papatasi fecundity.

conclusionsAnthropophilic behaviour of S. minuta was experimentally demonstrated; although sand fly females prefer reptiles as hosts, they were attracted to the human volunteer and took a relatively high volume of blood. Their feeding times were longer than in sand fly species regularly feeding on mammals and their physiological parameters suggest that S. minuta is not adapted well for digestion of mammalian blood. Nevertheless, the ability to bite humans highlights the necessity of further studies on S. minuta vector competence to elucidate its potential role in circulation of Leishmania and phleboviruses pathogenic to humans.

Indexed as

LeishmaniaLizardsPhlebotomusPsychodidaeAnimalsDNAFemaleHumansMammalsMiceRabbitsDNAFeeding preferencesLeishmaniaPhlebotomusSand fliesSergentomyia

Identifiers

PMID37055860
PMCPMC10103492

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.