Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37055741›Full record

SynthesisBMC cancer2023

Cervical cancer survival prediction by machine learning algorithms: a systematic review.

Milad Rahimi, Atieh Akbari, Farkhondeh Asadi, Hassan Emami

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC cancer, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Milad RahimiDepartment of Health Information Technology and Management, Medical Informatics, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2750-3826
Atieh AkbariObstetrics and Gynecology, Cancer Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5628-0409
Farkhondeh AsadiDepartment of Health Information Technology and Management, Health Information Management, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. asadifar@sbmu.ac.ir.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0939-7983
Hassan EmamiDepartment of Health Information Technology and Management, Information Technology, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. haemami@sbmu.ac.ir.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4309-5049

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCervical cancer is a common malignant tumor of the female reproductive system and is considered a leading cause of mortality in women worldwide. The analysis of time to event, which is crucial for any clinical research, can be well done with the method of survival prediction. This study aims to systematically investigate the use of machine learning to predict survival in patients with cervical cancer.

methodAn electronic search of the PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases was performed on October 1, 2022. All articles extracted from the databases were collected in an Excel file and duplicate articles were removed. The articles were screened twice based on the title and the abstract and checked again with the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The main inclusion criterion was machine learning algorithms for predicting cervical cancer survival. The information extracted from the articles included authors, publication year, dataset details, survival type, evaluation criteria, machine learning models, and the algorithm execution method.

resultsA total of 13 articles were included in this study, most of which were published from 2018 onwards. The most common machine learning models were random forest (6 articles, 46%), logistic regression (4 articles, 30%), support vector machines (3 articles, 23%), ensemble and hybrid learning (3 articles, 23%), and Deep Learning (3 articles, 23%). The number of sample datasets in the study varied between 85 and 14946 patients, and the models were internally validated except for two articles. The area under the curve (AUC) range for overall survival (0.40 to 0.99), disease-free survival (0.56 to 0.88), and progression-free survival (0.67 to 0.81), respectively from (lowest to highest) received. Finally, 15 variables with an effective role in predicting cervical cancer survival were identified.

conclusionCombining heterogeneous multidimensional data with machine learning techniques can play a very influential role in predicting cervical cancer survival. Despite the benefits of machine learning, the problem of interpretability, explainability, and imbalanced datasets is still one of the biggest challenges. Providing machine learning algorithms for survival prediction as a standard requires further studies.

Indexed as

Uterine Cervical NeoplasmsAlgorithmsFemaleHumansMachine LearningCervical CancerDeep LearningMachine LearningSurvival Prediction

Identifiers

PMID37055741
PMCPMC10103471

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.