SynthesisBMC cancer2023
Cervical cancer survival prediction by machine learning algorithms: a systematic review.
Synthesis in BMC cancer, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
33 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Comparison of machine learning methods versus traditional Cox regression for survival prediction in cancer using real-world data: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis.BMC medical research methodology · 2025Pooled it
- Survival prediction landscape: an in-depth systematic literature review on activities, methods, tools, diseases, and databases.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2024Pooled it
- Machine Learning-driven Prediction of Cervical Cancer Cell Viability After Treatment With Thymoquinone, Curcumin, and 5-Fluorouracil.Applied biochemistry and biotechnology · 2026Article
- Unsupervised clustering analysis unravels the role of systemic inflammatory indices in the prognosis of patients with locally advanced cervical cancer treated with chemoradiation.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2026Article
- Machine-Learning-Based Evaluation of the Prognostic Significance of the Non-High-Density Lipoprotein to High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Ratio in Critical Ischemic Stroke.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2026Article
- AI-assisted diagnosis of cervical dysplasia from cervicography images.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- CERV-Score: A Hybrid Machine Learning Framework for Cervical Cancer Risk Prediction Using Integrated Clinical and Genomic Data.International journal of telemedicine and applications · 2026Article
- Leveraging machine learning algorithms to assess the impact of cervical cancer early detection on patients' survival.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Prognostic value of an integrated immune-inflammatory phenotype in surgically treated cervical cancer: survival modeling and immunohistochemical validation.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Application of Artificial Intelligence in Stem Cells and Gene Therapy for Gynecological Cancers.Current stem cell research & therapy · 2026Review
- CITOBOT AI for real-world cervical cancer screening using colposcopy imaging.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Machine learning in early screening for high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia using blood testing.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025Article
- MGWO-CNN: hyperparameter optimization of CNN classifier for cervical cancer detection using Modified Grey Wolf Optimizer.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- A Novel Method for Predicting Oncogenic Types of Human Papillomavirus.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Development of machine learning models for survival prediction in nasopharyngeal carcinoma using population-based data.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- Cervical cancer prediction using deformable kernel darknet-53 and depth wise separable convolutional neural networks.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Interpretable Machine Learning Model for Predicting and Assessing the Risk of Diabetic Nephropathy: Prediction Model Study.JMIR medical informatics · 2025Article
- Machine-Learning-Assisted Analysis of Patient Clinical Biomarkers to Improve Ovarian Cancer Diagnosis.Precision chemistry · 2025Article
- Comparative study of five-year cervical cancer cause-specific survival prediction models based on SEER data.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Machine and Deep Learning for the Diagnosis, Prognosis, and Treatment of Cervical Cancer: A Scoping Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCervical cancer is a common malignant tumor of the female reproductive system and is considered a leading cause of mortality in women worldwide. The analysis of time to event, which is crucial for any clinical research, can be well done with the method of survival prediction. This study aims to systematically investigate the use of machine learning to predict survival in patients with cervical cancer.
methodAn electronic search of the PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases was performed on October 1, 2022. All articles extracted from the databases were collected in an Excel file and duplicate articles were removed. The articles were screened twice based on the title and the abstract and checked again with the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The main inclusion criterion was machine learning algorithms for predicting cervical cancer survival. The information extracted from the articles included authors, publication year, dataset details, survival type, evaluation criteria, machine learning models, and the algorithm execution method.
resultsA total of 13 articles were included in this study, most of which were published from 2018 onwards. The most common machine learning models were random forest (6 articles, 46%), logistic regression (4 articles, 30%), support vector machines (3 articles, 23%), ensemble and hybrid learning (3 articles, 23%), and Deep Learning (3 articles, 23%). The number of sample datasets in the study varied between 85 and 14946 patients, and the models were internally validated except for two articles. The area under the curve (AUC) range for overall survival (0.40 to 0.99), disease-free survival (0.56 to 0.88), and progression-free survival (0.67 to 0.81), respectively from (lowest to highest) received. Finally, 15 variables with an effective role in predicting cervical cancer survival were identified.
conclusionCombining heterogeneous multidimensional data with machine learning techniques can play a very influential role in predicting cervical cancer survival. Despite the benefits of machine learning, the problem of interpretability, explainability, and imbalanced datasets is still one of the biggest challenges. Providing machine learning algorithms for survival prediction as a standard requires further studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.