Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37055738›Full record

ArticleBMC infectious diseases2023

Influenza vaccine uptake among children and older adults in China: a secondary analysis of a quasi-experimental study.

Yumeng Du, Chenqi Jin, Mark Jit, Tracey Chantler, Leesa Lin, Heidi J Larson, Jing Li, Wenfeng Gong, Fan Yang, Nina Ren and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Yumeng DuInstitute for Healthcare Artificial Intelligence Application, Guangdong Second Provincial General Hospital, Guangzhou, China.
Chenqi JinUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Project-China, Guangzhou, China.
Mark JitFaculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Tracey ChantlerFaculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Leesa LinFaculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Heidi J LarsonFaculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Jing LiDepartment of Occupational and Environmental Health, West China School of Public Health, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Wenfeng GongChina Country Office, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Beijing, China.
Fan YangInstitute of Population Research, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Nina RenInstitute for Healthcare Artificial Intelligence Application, Guangdong Second Provincial General Hospital, Guangzhou, China.
Weibin ChengInstitute for Healthcare Artificial Intelligence Application, Guangdong Second Provincial General Hospital, Guangzhou, China.
Yi ZhouZhuhai Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Zhuhai, China.
Weiming Tang *Institute for Healthcare Artificial Intelligence Application, Guangdong Second Provincial General Hospital, Guangzhou, China.
Joseph D Tucker *Department of Clinical Research, Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Dan Wu *Department of Clinical Research, Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK. dan.wu@lshtm.ac.uk.
London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USBill & Melinda Gates Foundation · USPeking University · CNSichuan University · CNZhuhai People's Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInfluenza vaccination is the key to prevent influenza-related disease, especially among high-risk populations. However, influenza vaccine uptake in China is low. This secondary analysis of a quasi-experimental trial aimed to understand factors associated with influenza vaccine uptake among children and older people stratified by funding context.

methodsA total of 225 children (aged 0.5-8 years) and 225 older people (aged 60 years or above) were recruited from three clinics (rural, suburban and urban) in Guangdong Province. Participants were allocated into two groups based on funding contexts: a self-paid group (N = 150, 75 children and 75 older adults) in which participants paid full price for their vaccination; and a subsidized group (N = 300, 150 children and 150 older adults) in which varying levels of financial support was provided. Univariate and multivariable logistic regressions were conducted stratified by funding contexts.

resultsOverall, 75.0% (225/300) of participants in the subsidized group and 36.7% (55/150) in the self-paid group got vaccinated. Older adults had lower vaccination rates than children in both funding groups, while both age groups showed much higher uptake in the subsidized group than in the self-paid group (aOR = 5.96, 95% CI: 3.77-9.42, p = 0.001). In the self-paid group, having prior influenza vaccination history of children (aOR:2.61, 95%CI: 1.06-6.42) or older people (aOR:4.76, 95%CI: 1.08-20.90) was associated with increased influenza vaccine uptake compared to those who had no prior vaccination experiences in the family. While in the subsidized group, participants who got married or lived with partners (aOR = 0.32, 0.10-0.98) had lower vaccination uptake than single ones. Trust in providers' advice (aOR = 4.95, 95%CI:1.99, 12.43), perceived effectiveness of the vaccine (aOR: 12.18, 95%CI: 5.21-28.50), and experienced influenza-like illnesses in the family in the past year (aOR = 46.52, 4.10, 533.78) were associated with higher vaccine uptake.

conclusionsOlder people had suboptimal vaccine uptake compared to children in both contexts and need more attention to enhance influenza vaccination. Tailoring interventions to different vaccine funding contexts may help improve influenza vaccination: In self-paid context, motivating people to accept their first ever influenza vaccination may be a promising strategy. In subsidized context, improving public confidence in vaccine effectiveness and providers' advice would be useful.

Indexed as

Influenza, HumanInfluenza VaccinesAgedChildChinaHumansPatient Acceptance of Health CareVaccinationInfluenza VaccinesChildrenChinaInfluenza vaccinesOlder adults

Identifiers

PMID37055738
PMCPMC10098986
OpenAlexW4365451961

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.