Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37055667›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2023

Morphology of the major duodenal papilla for the selection of advanced cannulation techniques in difficult biliary cannulation.

Phonthep Angsuwatcharakon, Chompoonuch Thongsuwan, Wiriyaporn Ridtitid, Panida Piyachaturawat, Santi Kulpatcharapong, Pradermchai Kongkam, Rungsun Rerknimitr

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Phonthep AngsuwatcharakonDepartment of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University and King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.
Chompoonuch ThongsuwanDepartment of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University and King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.
Wiriyaporn RidtitidDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University and King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.
Panida PiyachaturawatDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University and King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.
Santi KulpatcharapongDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University and King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.
Pradermchai KongkamDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University and King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.
Rungsun RerknimitrDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University and King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand. ercp@live.com.
Chulalongkorn University · THKing Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital · TH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMorphology of the major duodenal papilla (MDP) influences the outcome of standard biliary cannulation. However, those data on advanced cannulation techniques are scarce. We aimed to study the impact of MDP morphology on the outcome of both standard and advanced cannulation methods.

methodsImages of naïve papilla were retrospectively reviewed and independently classified into 4 types (1: classic appearance, 2: small, 3: bulging, and 4: ridged papillae). All cannulation was started with guidewire cannulation. After failure, advanced cannulation including double guidewire (DG) and/or precut sphincterotomy (PS) was performed. Outcomes including success rate and complications were analyzed.

resultsA total 805 naïve papilla were included. The overall advanced cannulation rate was 23.2%. The MPD type 2 (OR 1.8, 95% CI 1.8-2.9) and type 4 (OR 2.1, 95% CI 1.1-3.8) required advanced cannulation technique at a higher rate than type 1. Type 3 significantly needed a higher proportion of PS when compared with type 1 (59.09% vs 27.03%, OR 3.90, 95% CI 1.51-10.06). Overall post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) was 8% and was not different among MDP types. PEP was significantly increased in difficult cannulation group (15.38% vs 5.71%, p-value < 0.001). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that DG independently increased risk of PEP (OR 3.6, 95% CI 2.0-6.6).

conclusionsMDP type 2 and type 4 were related to difficult cannulation. Although DG and PS can be used as advanced cannulation in all types, DG carries risk of PEP and PS may be preferred over DG in MDP type 3.

Indexed as

Ampulla of VaterCatheterizationCholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic RetrogradeHumansRetrospective StudiesSphincterotomy, EndoscopicDouble guidewire cannulationMajor duodenal papilla morphologyPrecut sphincterotomy

Identifiers

PMID37055667
OpenAlexW4365458342

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.