Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37055628›Full record

ArticleNature neuroscience2023

A reservoir of foraging decision variables in the mouse brain.

Fanny Cazettes, Luca Mazzucato, Masayoshi Murakami, Joao P Morais, Elisabete Augusto, Alfonso Renart, Zachary F Mainen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature neuroscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Neural mechanisms of flexible perceptual inference.PLoS computational biology · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. The maps of meaning consciousness theory.Frontiers in psychology · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Parallel processing of alternative approaches.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Fanny CazettesChampalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal. fanny.cazettes@neuro.fchampalimaud.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9648-4761
Luca MazzucatoDepartments of Biology, Mathematics & Physics, Institute of Neuroscience, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, USA.
Masayoshi MurakamiChampalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal.
Joao P MoraisChampalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal.
Elisabete AugustoChampalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal.
Alfonso RenartChampalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal. alfonso.renart@neuro.fchampalimaud.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7916-9930
Zachary F MainenChampalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal. zmainen@neuro.fchampalimaud.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7913-9109

Funding

Brain States and Flexible BehaviorRF1NS118461 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF OREGON · PI JARAMILLO, SANTIAGO, MCCORMICK, DAVID · 2020 to 2020
$2.4M
CRCNS: A mechanistic theory of serotonergic modulation of cortical processingR01DA055439 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF OREGON · PI MAZZUCATO, LUCA, NIELL, CRISTOPHER M · 2021 to 2025
$1.6M
Brain States and Flexible BehaviorR01NS118461 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF OREGON · PI MCCORMICK, DAVID, NIELL, CRISTOPHER M · 2023 to 2024
$1.4M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA055439NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS118461NINDS NIH HHS RF1 NS118461
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In any given situation, the environment can be parsed in different ways to yield decision variables (DVs) defining strategies useful for different tasks. It is generally presumed that the brain only computes a single DV defining the current behavioral strategy. Here to test this assumption, we recorded neural ensembles in the frontal cortex of mice performing a foraging task admitting multiple DVs. Methods developed to uncover the currently employed DV revealed the use of multiple strategies and occasional switches in strategy within sessions. Optogenetic manipulations showed that the secondary motor cortex (M2) is needed for mice to use the different DVs in the task. Surprisingly, we found that regardless of which DV best explained the current behavior, M2 activity concurrently encoded a full basis set of computations defining a reservoir of DVs appropriate for alternative tasks. This form of neural multiplexing may confer considerable advantages for learning and adaptive behavior.

Indexed as

Motor CortexAdaptation, PsychologicalAnimalsLearningMice

Identifiers

PMID37055628
PMCPMC10280691

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.