Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37055616›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Neuroscience2023

A unifying perspective on neural manifolds and circuits for cognition.

Christopher Langdon, Mikhail Genkin, Tatiana A Engel

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Neuroscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 101 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
101citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

101 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Making models disagree to learn how brains compute.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Artificial neural manifolds.Nature communications · 2026
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Initial organization and progressive expansion of the math-responsive brain network during the first school years.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  14. Transformations of the spatial activity manifold convey aversive information in CA3.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  15. Primary cilia and neural computation.Journal of biomedical science · 2026
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Mesocorticostriatal Reinforcement Learning of State Representation and Value with Implications for the Mechanisms of Schizophrenia.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  20. Article

41 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Christopher Langdon *Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5167-7626
Mikhail Genkin *Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5476-7683
Tatiana A EngelPrinceton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA. tatiana.engel@princeton.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-5842-9406

Funding

Multiscale computational frameworks for integrating large-scale cortical dynamics, connectivity, and behaviorRF1DA055666 · NIDA · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI ENGEL, TATIANA · 2021 to 2021
$1.3M
Discovering dynamic computations from large-scale neural activity recordingsR01EB026949 · NIBIB · COLD SPRING HARBOR LABORATORY · PI ENGEL, TATIANA · 2018 to 2020
$1.3M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB026949NIDA NIH HHS RF1 DA055666
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Two different perspectives have informed efforts to explain the link between the brain and behaviour. One approach seeks to identify neural circuit elements that carry out specific functions, emphasizing connectivity between neurons as a substrate for neural computations. Another approach centres on neural manifolds - low-dimensional representations of behavioural signals in neural population activity - and suggests that neural computations are realized by emergent dynamics. Although manifolds reveal an interpretable structure in heterogeneous neuronal activity, finding the corresponding structure in connectivity remains a challenge. We highlight examples in which establishing the correspondence between low-dimensional activity and connectivity has been possible, unifying the neural manifold and circuit perspectives. This relationship is conspicuous in systems in which the geometry of neural responses mirrors their spatial layout in the brain, such as the fly navigational system. Furthermore, we describe evidence that, in systems in which neural responses are heterogeneous, the circuit comprises interactions between activity patterns on the manifold via low-rank connectivity. We suggest that unifying the manifold and circuit approaches is important if we are to be able to causally test theories about the neural computations that underlie behaviour.

Indexed as

BrainNeuronsCognition

Identifiers

PMID37055616
PMCPMC11058347

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.