Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37055598›Full record

ArticleJournal of assisted reproduction and genetics2023

PGT-A improved singleton live birth rate among all age groups of women who underwent elective single blastocyst transfer: a single-centre retrospective study.

Zetong Zheng, Jifan Tan, Lin Chen, Simin Liu, Canquan Zhou, Yubin Li

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Addressing multiple pregnancies in in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer: Current status, challenges, and solutions.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Zetong ZhengReproductive Medicine Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Zhoushan 2 Road, Guangzhou, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Jifan TanReproductive Medicine Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Zhoushan 2 Road, Guangzhou, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Lin ChenReproductive Medicine Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Zhoushan 2 Road, Guangzhou, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Simin LiuReproductive Medicine Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Zhoushan 2 Road, Guangzhou, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Canquan ZhouReproductive Medicine Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Zhoushan 2 Road, Guangzhou, Guangdong, People's Republic of China. zhoucanquan@mail.sysu.edu.cn.
Yubin LiReproductive Medicine Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Zhoushan 2 Road, Guangzhou, Guangdong, People's Republic of China. liyubin97200@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6612-1321
Sun Yat-sen University · CN

Funding

Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine 2020B1212060029Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province 2021A1515010559
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study assessed the difference in singleton live birth rate (SLBR) between preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) and non-PGT in patients undergoing elective single frozen blastocyst transfer (eSFBT).

methodsThis retrospective cohort study evaluated 10,701 cycles of eSFBT, including PGT-A (n = 3125) and non-PGT (n = 7576). Cycles were further stratified according to age at retrieval. The main outcome was SLBR; secondary outcomes were clinical pregnancy, conception rates, and multiple live birth rate. Confounders were adjusted using multivariable logistic regression models, and the trend test was performed using the general linear model.

resultsSLBR was negatively correlated with age in the non-PGT group (p-trend < 0.001) but not in PGT-A group (p-trend = 0.974). Stratified by the age, SLBR were significantly different between two groups except for the 20-24-year-old group: PGT-A vs non-PGT group in 20-24, 25-29, 30-34, 35-39 and ≥ 40-year-old subgroups were, 53.5% vs 53.2%, 53.5% vs 48.0%, 53.5% vs 43.1%, 53.3% vs 32.5%, and 42.9% vs 17.6%, respectively. In addition, after adjusting for potential confounders, SLBR still remained significantly different in all age groups except in the youngest quartile (PGT-A vs non-PGT group, 20-24: adjusted odds ratio (aOR), 1.33, 95% CI, 0.92-1.92, p = 0.129; 25-29: aOR, 1.32, 95% CI, 1.14-1.52, p < 0.001; 30-34: aOR, 1.91, 95% CI, 1.65-2.20, p < 0.001; 35-39: aOR, 2.50, 95% CI, 1.97-3.17, p < 0.001; ≥ 40: aOR, 3.54, 95% CI, 1.66-7.55, p = 0.001).

conclusionPGT-A might improve SLBR among all age groups and play an increasingly important role in SLBR in older patients who underwent eSFBT.

Indexed as

Birth RatePreimplantation DiagnosisAdultAgedAneuploidyBlastocystEmbryo TransferFemaleGenetic TestingHumansLive BirthPregnancyPregnancy RateRetrospective StudiesYoung AdultAneuploidyElective single frozen blastocyst transferEmbryo morphologyPreimplantation genetic testingReproductive aging

Identifiers

PMID37055598
PMCPMC10310591
OpenAlexW4365484794

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.