ArticleClinical rheumatology2023
Metabolic inflammatory volume and total inflammatory glycolysis: novel parameters to evaluate PET-CT disease activity in Takayasu arteritis.
Article in Clinical rheumatology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- 2025 Chinese guideline for the imaging diagnosis and evaluation of Takayasu arteritis.Advances in rheumatology (London, England) · 2025Guideline
- Management of Takayasu Arteritis - A 2026 Update.Current rheumatology reports · 2026Review
- Positron Emission Tomography in Takayasu Arteritis: A Review Including Patterns of Vascular Involvement Across Modalities and Regions.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- What does artificial intelligence mean in rheumatology?Archives of rheumatology · 2024Review
- Advanced molecular imaging in large-vessel vasculitis: Adopting FDG-PET into a clinical workflow.Best practice & research. Clinical rheumatology · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo evaluate diagnostic accuracy for active Takayasu arteritis (TAK) for two novel
methodsFrom a cohort of TAK (n = 36, 35 immunosuppressive-naïve), images of PET-CTs were reviewed for mean and maximum standardized uptake value (SUV
resultsUsing dichotomized cut-offs for active TAK at SUV
conclusionsMIV and TIG performed similarly, therefore, are viable alternatives to existing PET-CT parameters to assess TAK disease activity in this preliminary report. Key Points • MIV and TIG performed similar to SUV
Indexed as
Identifiers
37055597What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.