Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37055491›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Graphene oxide classification and standardization.

Katarzyna Z Donato, Hui Li Tan, Valeria S Marangoni, Marcos V S Martins, Pei Rou Ng, Mariana C F Costa, Purvi Jain, Sarah J Lee, Gavin K W Koon, Ricardo K Donato and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
8.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 90 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Katarzyna Z DonatoCentre for Advanced 2D Materials, National University of Singapore, Singapore, 117546, Singapore.
Hui Li TanCentre for Advanced 2D Materials, National University of Singapore, Singapore, 117546, Singapore.
Valeria S MarangoniCentre for Advanced 2D Materials, National University of Singapore, Singapore, 117546, Singapore.
Marcos V S MartinsCentre for Advanced 2D Materials, National University of Singapore, Singapore, 117546, Singapore.
Pei Rou NgCentre for Advanced 2D Materials, National University of Singapore, Singapore, 117546, Singapore.
Mariana C F CostaCentre for Advanced 2D Materials, National University of Singapore, Singapore, 117546, Singapore.
Purvi JainCentre for Advanced 2D Materials, National University of Singapore, Singapore, 117546, Singapore.
Sarah J LeeCentre for Advanced 2D Materials, National University of Singapore, Singapore, 117546, Singapore.
Gavin K W KoonCentre for Advanced 2D Materials, National University of Singapore, Singapore, 117546, Singapore.
Ricardo K DonatoCentre for Advanced 2D Materials, National University of Singapore, Singapore, 117546, Singapore. donato@nus.edu.sg.
A H Castro NetoCentre for Advanced 2D Materials, National University of Singapore, Singapore, 117546, Singapore. c2dhead@nus.edu.sg.
National University of Singapore · SGBrazilian Center for Research in Energy and Materials · BRNanyang Technological University · SGUniversity of Manchester · GB

Funding

Ministry of Education - Singapore EDUNC-33-18-279-V12National Research Foundation, Prime Minister's Office Medium-Sized Centre Programme - Centre for Advanced 2D Materials (CA2DM)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is a need to classify and standardize graphene-related materials giving the growing use of this materials industrially. One of the most used and more difficult to classify is graphene oxide (GO). Inconsistent definitions of GO, closely relating it to graphene, are found in the literature and industrial brochures. Hence, although they have very different physicochemical properties and industrial applications, commonly used classifications of graphene and GO definitions are not substantial. Consequently, the lack of regulation and standardization create trust issues among sellers and buyers that impede industrial development and progress. With that in mind, this study offers a critical assessment of 34 commercially available GOs, characterized using a systematic and reliable protocol for accessing their quality. We establish correlations between GO physicochemical properties and its applications leading to rationale for its classification.

Identifiers

PMID37055491
PMCPMC10102077
OpenAlexW4365450699

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.