Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37055480›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Tea leaf disease detection and identification based on YOLOv7 (YOLO-T).

Md Janibul Alam Soeb, Md Fahad Jubayer, Tahmina Akanjee Tarin, Muhammad Rashed Al Mamun, Fahim Mahafuz Ruhad, Aney Parven, Nabisab Mujawar Mubarak, Soni Lanka Karri, Islam Md Meftaul

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed
73.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 185 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Md Janibul Alam Soeb *Department of Farm Power and Machinery, Sylhet Agricultural University, Sylhet, 3100, Bangladesh. janibul.fpm@sau.ac.bd.
Md Fahad Jubayer *Department of Food Engineering and Technology, Sylhet Agricultural University, Sylhet, 3100, Bangladesh. jubayer.fet@sau.ac.bd.
Tahmina Akanjee TarinDepartment of Farm Power and Machinery, Sylhet Agricultural University, Sylhet, 3100, Bangladesh.
Muhammad Rashed Al MamunDepartment of Farm Power and Machinery, Sylhet Agricultural University, Sylhet, 3100, Bangladesh.
Fahim Mahafuz RuhadDepartment of Agricultural Construction and Environmental Engineering, Sylhet Agricultural University, Sylhet, 3100, Bangladesh.
Aney ParvenGlobal Centre for Environmental Remediation (GCER), College of Engineering, Science and Environment, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia.
Nabisab Mujawar MubarakPetroleum and Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Brunei, Bandar Seri Begawan, BE1410, Brunei Darussalam. mubarak.mujawar@utb.edu.bn.
Soni Lanka KarriFaculty of Integrated Technologies, Universiti Brunei Darussalam, Bandar Seri Begawan, BE1410, Brunei Darussalam.
Islam Md MeftaulGlobal Centre for Environmental Remediation (GCER), College of Engineering, Science and Environment, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia. mdmeftaul.islam@uon.edu.au.
Sylhet Agricultural University · BDSher-e-Bangla Agricultural University · BDUniversiti Brunei Darussalam · BNUniversiti Teknologi Brunei · BN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A reliable and accurate diagnosis and identification system is required to prevent and manage tea leaf diseases. Tea leaf diseases are detected manually, increasing time and affecting yield quality and productivity. This study aims to present an artificial intelligence-based solution to the problem of tea leaf disease detection by training the fastest single-stage object detection model, YOLOv7, on the diseased tea leaf dataset collected from four prominent tea gardens in Bangladesh. 4000 digital images of five types of leaf diseases are collected from these tea gardens, generating a manually annotated, data-augmented leaf disease image dataset. This study incorporates data augmentation approaches to solve the issue of insufficient sample sizes. The detection and identification results for the YOLOv7 approach are validated by prominent statistical metrics like detection accuracy, precision, recall, mAP value, and F1-score, which resulted in 97.3%, 96.7%, 96.4%, 98.2%, and 0.965, respectively. Experimental results demonstrate that YOLOv7 for tea leaf diseases in natural scene images is superior to existing target detection and identification networks, including CNN, Deep CNN, DNN, AX-Retina Net, improved DCNN, YOLOv5, and Multi-objective image segmentation. Hence, this study is expected to minimize the workload of entomologists and aid in the rapid identification and detection of tea leaf diseases, thus minimizing economic losses.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceBangladeshPlant LeavesTeaTea

Identifiers

PMID37055480
PMCPMC10102080
OpenAlexW4365451359

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.