ArticleScientific reports2023
Contrastive learning-based pretraining improves representation and transferability of diabetic retinopathy classification models.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Transformer-encoded nnU-Net with local region perceptron and contrastive learning (TLC-nnUNet) for multiple brain metastasis detection and delineation.Physics in medicine and biology · 2026Article
- Prospective applications of artificial intelligence for the diagnosis of oral leukoplakia: a scoping review.Frontiers in oral health · 2026Review
- A Self-Supervised Equivariant Refinement Classification Network for Diabetic Retinopathy Classification.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2025Article
- Automated Foveal Avascular Zone Segmentation in Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography Across Multiple Eye Diseases Using Knowledge Distillation.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Distributed training of foundation models for ophthalmic diagnosis.Communications engineering · 2025Article
- OpthaNet: Attention-Integrated Architecture for High-Precision Multi-Class Ophthalmic Image Classification.Healthcare technology lettersArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is a major cause of vision impairment in diabetic patients worldwide. Due to its prevalence, early clinical diagnosis is essential to improve treatment management of DR patients. Despite recent demonstration of successful machine learning (ML) models for automated DR detection, there is a significant clinical need for robust models that can be trained with smaller cohorts of dataset and still perform with high diagnostic accuracy in independent clinical datasets (i.e., high model generalizability). Towards this need, we have developed a self-supervised contrastive learning (CL) based pipeline for classification of referable vs non-referable DR. Self-supervised CL based pretraining allows enhanced data representation, therefore, the development of robust and generalized deep learning (DL) models, even with small, labeled datasets. We have integrated a neural style transfer (NST) augmentation in the CL pipeline to produce models with better representations and initializations for the detection of DR in color fundus images. We compare our CL pretrained model performance with two state of the art baseline models pretrained with Imagenet weights. We further investigate the model performance with reduced labeled training data (down to 10 percent) to test the robustness of the model when trained with small, labeled datasets. The model is trained and validated on the EyePACS dataset and tested independently on clinical datasets from the University of Illinois, Chicago (UIC). Compared to baseline models, our CL pretrained FundusNet model had higher area under the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve (AUC) (CI) values (0.91 (0.898 to 0.930) vs 0.80 (0.783 to 0.820) and 0.83 (0.801 to 0.853) on UIC data). At 10 percent labeled training data, the FundusNet AUC was 0.81 (0.78 to 0.84) vs 0.58 (0.56 to 0.64) and 0.63 (0.60 to 0.66) in baseline models, when tested on the UIC dataset. CL based pretraining with NST significantly improves DL classification performance, helps the model generalize well (transferable from EyePACS to UIC data), and allows training with small, annotated datasets, therefore reducing ground truth annotation burden of the clinicians.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.