Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37055456›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Collaborative training of medical artificial intelligence models with non-uniform labels.

Soroosh Tayebi Arasteh, Peter Isfort, Marwin Saehn, Gustav Mueller-Franzes, Firas Khader, Jakob Nikolas Kather, Christiane Kuhl, Sven Nebelung, Daniel Truhn

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Current trends and future directions of artificial intelligence in lung cancer diagnosis.Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Soroosh Tayebi ArastehDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstr. 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany.
Peter IsfortDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstr. 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany.
Marwin SaehnDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstr. 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany.
Gustav Mueller-FranzesDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstr. 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany.
Firas KhaderDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstr. 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany.
Jakob Nikolas KatherDepartment of Medicine III, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany.
Christiane KuhlDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstr. 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany.
Sven Nebelung *Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstr. 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany.
Daniel Truhn *Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstr. 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany. dtruhn@ukaachen.de.
RWTH Aachen University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Due to the rapid advancements in recent years, medical image analysis is largely dominated by deep learning (DL). However, building powerful and robust DL models requires training with large multi-party datasets. While multiple stakeholders have provided publicly available datasets, the ways in which these data are labeled vary widely. For Instance, an institution might provide a dataset of chest radiographs containing labels denoting the presence of pneumonia, while another institution might have a focus on determining the presence of metastases in the lung. Training a single AI model utilizing all these data is not feasible with conventional federated learning (FL). This prompts us to propose an extension to the widespread FL process, namely flexible federated learning (FFL) for collaborative training on such data. Using 695,000 chest radiographs from five institutions from across the globe-each with differing labels-we demonstrate that having heterogeneously labeled datasets, FFL-based training leads to significant performance increase compared to conventional FL training, where only the uniformly annotated images are utilized. We believe that our proposed algorithm could accelerate the process of bringing collaborative training methods from research and simulation phase to the real-world applications in healthcare.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsArtificial IntelligenceComputer SimulationHealth FacilitiesThorax

Identifiers

PMID37055456
PMCPMC10102221
OpenAlexW4365479063

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.