ArticleScientific reports2023
From comparative gene content and gene order to ancestral contigs, chromosomes and karyotypes.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Legume genome structures and histories inferred from Cercis canadensis and Chamaecrista fasciculata genomes.The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology · 2026Article
- EdgeHOG: a method for fine-grained ancestral gene order inference at large scale.Nature ecology & evolution · 2025Article
- AGO, a Framework for the Reconstruction of Ancestral Syntenies and Gene Orders.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To reconstruct the ancestral genome of a set of phylogenetically related descendant species, we use the RACCROCHE pipeline for organizing a large number of generalized gene adjacencies into contigs and then into chromosomes. Separate reconstructions are carried out for each ancestral node of the phylogenetic tree for focal taxa. The ancestral reconstructions are monoploids; they each contain at most one member of each gene family constructed from descendants, ordered along the chromosomes. We design and implement a new computational technique for solving the problem of estimating the ancestral monoploid number of chromosomes x. This involves a "g-mer" analysis to resolve a bias due long contigs, and gap statistics to estimate x. We find that the monoploid number of all the rosid and asterid orders is [Formula: see text]. We show that this is not an artifact of our method by deriving [Formula: see text] for the metazoan ancestor.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.