Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37053415›Full record

ArticlePsychological methods2024

A posterior expected value approach to decision-making in the multiphase optimization strategy for intervention science.

Jillian C Strayhorn, Linda M Collins, David J Vanness

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychological methods, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Using decision analysis for intervention value efficiency to select optimized interventions in the multiphase optimization strategy.Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jillian C StrayhornDepartment of Human Development and Family Studies, Pennsylvania State University.ORCID 0000-0003-3502-9623
Linda M CollinsSchool of Global Public Health, New York University.ORCID 0000-0003-4282-8722
David J VannessDepartment of Health Policy and Administration, Pennsylvania State University.ORCID 0000-0002-9790-2988
Pennsylvania State University · USNew York University · US

Funding

Transdisciplinary Theoretical Svnthesis and Development CoreP30DA011041 · NIDA · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI Holly Hagan · 1998 to 2026
$38.9M
Testing Relapse Recovery Intervention ComponentsP01CA180945 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI MCCARTHY, DANIELLE ERIN · 2014 to 2023
$23.0M
Pilot, Mentoring, and Professional Development CoreP50DA039838 · NIDA · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, THE · PI COLLINS, LINDA M · 2015 to 2019
$13.9M
Optimizing substance misuse prevention and treatment interventions for enhanced public health impact: Incorporating Bayesian decision analytics into the multiphase optimization strategyF31DA052140 · NIDA · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, THE · PI STRAYHORN, JILLIAN CLAIRE · 2020 to 2021
$73k
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA180945NIDA NIH HHS F31 DA052140NIDA NIH HHS P30 DA011041NIDA NIH HHS P50 DA039838
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In current practice, intervention scientists applying the multiphase optimization strategy (MOST) with a 2

Indexed as

Bayes TheoremDecision MakingHumansModels, StatisticalMonte Carlo MethodPsychologyResearch Design

Identifiers

PMID37053415
PMCPMC12701551
OpenAlexW4365450795

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.