Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37053268›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2023

Improving the workflow to crack Small, Unbalanced, Noisy, but Genuine (SUNG) datasets in bioacoustics: The case of bonobo calls.

Vincent Arnaud, François Pellegrino, Sumir Keenan, Xavier St-Gelais, Nicolas Mathevon, Florence Levréro, Christophe Coupé

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Utterance evolution: the road to generative, combinatorial communicators.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The Sensory Ecology of Speciation.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.

Vincent ArnaudDépartement des arts, des lettres et du langage, Université du Québec à Chicoutimi, Chicoutimi, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-1766-5725
François PellegrinoLaboratoire Dynamique Du Langage, UMR 5596, Université de Lyon, CNRS, Lyon, France.ORCID 0000-0002-6456-1953
Sumir KeenanENES Bioacoustics Research Laboratory, University of Saint Étienne, CRNL, CNRS UMR 5292, Inserm UMR_S 1028, Saint-Étienne, France.
Xavier St-GelaisDépartement des arts, des lettres et du langage, Université du Québec à Chicoutimi, Chicoutimi, Canada.
Nicolas MathevonENES Bioacoustics Research Laboratory, University of Saint Étienne, CRNL, CNRS UMR 5292, Inserm UMR_S 1028, Saint-Étienne, France.
Florence LevréroENES Bioacoustics Research Laboratory, University of Saint Étienne, CRNL, CNRS UMR 5292, Inserm UMR_S 1028, Saint-Étienne, France.
Christophe CoupéLaboratoire Dynamique Du Langage, UMR 5596, Université de Lyon, CNRS, Lyon, France.ORCID 0000-0002-3323-9742
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FRUniversité du Québec à Chicoutimi · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the accumulation of data and studies, deciphering animal vocal communication remains challenging. In most cases, researchers must deal with the sparse recordings composing Small, Unbalanced, Noisy, but Genuine (SUNG) datasets. SUNG datasets are characterized by a limited number of recordings, most often noisy, and unbalanced in number between the individuals or categories of vocalizations. SUNG datasets therefore offer a valuable but inevitably distorted vision of communication systems. Adopting the best practices in their analysis is essential to effectively extract the available information and draw reliable conclusions. Here we show that the most recent advances in machine learning applied to a SUNG dataset succeed in unraveling the complex vocal repertoire of the bonobo, and we propose a workflow that can be effective with other animal species. We implement acoustic parameterization in three feature spaces and run a Supervised Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection (S-UMAP) to evaluate how call types and individual signatures cluster in the bonobo acoustic space. We then implement three classification algorithms (Support Vector Machine, xgboost, neural networks) and their combination to explore the structure and variability of bonobo calls, as well as the robustness of the individual signature they encode. We underscore how classification performance is affected by the feature set and identify the most informative features. In addition, we highlight the need to address data leakage in the evaluation of classification performance to avoid misleading interpretations. Our results lead to identifying several practical approaches that are generalizable to any other animal communication system. To improve the reliability and replicability of vocal communication studies with SUNG datasets, we thus recommend: i) comparing several acoustic parameterizations; ii) visualizing the dataset with supervised UMAP to examine the species acoustic space; iii) adopting Support Vector Machines as the baseline classification approach; iv) explicitly evaluating data leakage and possibly implementing a mitigation strategy.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsPan paniscusAnimalsNeural Networks, ComputerReproducibility of ResultsWorkflow

Identifiers

PMID37053268
PMCPMC10129004
OpenAlexW4365457226

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.