Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37053260›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

Mixed management in growing and finishing pigs: Differences between gender and their impacts on behavior, growth performance, and physiological parameters.

Angela Cristina da Fonseca de Oliveira, Leandro Batista Costa, Saulo Henrique Weber, Yuliaxis Ramayo-Caldas, Antoni Dalmau

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Angela Cristina da Fonseca de OliveiraGraduate Program of Animal Science, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná -PUCPR, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil.
Leandro Batista CostaGraduate Program of Animal Science, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná -PUCPR, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-4200-9401
Saulo Henrique WeberGraduate Program of Animal Science, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná -PUCPR, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil.
Yuliaxis Ramayo-CaldasPorcine Control and Evaluation, Institut de Recerca i Tecnologia Agroalimentàries-IRTA, Monells, Spain.
Antoni DalmauPorcine Control and Evaluation, Institut de Recerca i Tecnologia Agroalimentàries-IRTA, Monells, Spain.
Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná · BRInstitute of Agrifood Research and Technology · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mixing, a common management strategy used to regroup pigs, has been reported to impair individual performance and affect pig welfare because of the establishment of a new social hierarchy after regrouping. In this study we aimed to determine whether mixing management (non-mixed vs. mixed) and gender (gilts vs. barrows) affect the social and non-social behavior, performance, and physiological parameters of pigs. A total of 96 growing pigs (48 barrows and 48 females) were separated into two treatments: control (CT)-pigs that were mixed once during the growing-finishing period; and social stress (SS)-pigs that were mixed thrice during the growing-finishing period. We recorded social and non-social behaviors, injury score, performance, and physiological parameters during the experimental period. Data were grouped by the period, based on each mix performed, and overall values. The statistical analysis performed considered gender and treatment. For treatment, during period-II and III, the SS group presented the highest frequency of agonistic interactions (AI), stayed longer lying laterally (LL) and sternly (LS), and explored more enrichment material (ER) than the CT group. Furthermore, SS pigs presented the highest injury score in the ear, head, and middle and posterior regions. Compared to the females, the barrows spent more time at the electronic feed station and initiated most of the agonistic interactions during period-II, and they presented a higher injury score for the ear and head regions during period-III. In conclusion, repeated regrouping significantly affected social and feeding behavior without severely altering performance and physiological parameters. Furthermore, different patterns of social and feeding behavior, agonistic interactions, and injury scores between barrows and females were observed. This study provides an understanding of the impact of mixing management and gender differences on pigs, and this knowledge can be used to improve swine productivity and welfare.

Indexed as

Animal FeedAnimal HusbandryAnimalsFemaleMaleSwine

Identifiers

PMID37053260
PMCPMC10101475
OpenAlexW4365442776

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.