Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37053233›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

Considerations in implementation of social risk factor screening and referral in maternal and infant care in Washington, DC: A qualitative study.

Jason Brown, Naheed Ahmed, Matthew Biel, Loral Patchen, Janine Rethy, Angela Thomas, Hannah Arem

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jason BrownMedstar Health Research Institute, Healthcare Delivery Research, Washington, DC, United States of America.
Naheed AhmedMedstar Health Research Institute, Healthcare Delivery Research, Washington, DC, United States of America.
Matthew BielDepartment of Psychiatry, Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC, United States of America.
Loral PatchenMedStar Washington Hospital Center, Women and Infant Services, Washington, DC, United States of America.
Janine RethyDepartment of Pediatrics, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States of America.
Angela ThomasMedstar Health Research Institute, Healthcare Delivery Research, Washington, DC, United States of America.
Hannah AremMedstar Health Research Institute, Healthcare Delivery Research, Washington, DC, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-5734-0810

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe District of Columbia (DC) has striking disparities in maternal and infant outcomes comparing Black to White women and babies. Social determinants of health (SDoH) are widely recognized as a significant contributor to these disparities in health outcomes. Screening for social risk factors and referral for appropriate services is a critical step in addressing social needs and reducing outcome disparities.

methodsWe conducted interviews among employees (n = 18) and patients (n = 9) across three diverse, urban clinics within a healthcare system and one community-based organization involved in a five-year initiative to reduce maternal and infant disparities in DC. Interviews were guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research to understand current processes and organizational factors that contributed to or impeded delivery of social risk factor screening and referral for indicated needs.

resultsWe found that current processes for social risk factor screening and referral differed between and within clinics depending on the patient population. Key facilitators of successful screening included a supportive organizational culture and adaptability of more patient-centered screening processes. Key barriers to delivery included high patient volume and limited electronic health record capabilities to record results and track the status of internal and community referrals. Areas identified for improvement included additional social risk factor assessment training for new providers, patient-centered approaches to screening, improved tracking processes, and facilitation of connections to social services within clinical settings.

conclusionDespite proliferation of social risk factor screeners and recognition of their importance within health care settings, few studies detail implementation processes for social risk factor screening and referrals. Future studies should test implementation strategies for screening and referral services to address identified barriers to implementation.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CareFamilyChildDistrict of ColumbiaFemaleHumansInfantInfant CareMass ScreeningReferral and Consultation

Identifiers

PMID37053233
PMCPMC10101493

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.