Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37053231›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

The role of social networks in the self-management support for young women recently diagnosed with breast cancer.

Ivaylo Vassilev, Sharon Xiaowen Lin, Lynn Calman, Josh Turner, Jane Frankland, David Wright, Claire Foster

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ivaylo VassilevSchool of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-2206-8247
Sharon Xiaowen LinARC Wessex, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Lynn CalmanCentre for Psychosocial Research in Cancer: CentRIC+, School of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Josh TurnerCentre for Psychosocial Research in Cancer: CentRIC+, School of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Jane FranklandCentre for Psychosocial Research in Cancer: CentRIC+, School of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
David WrightCentre for Psychosocial Research in Cancer: CentRIC+, School of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Claire FosterCentre for Psychosocial Research in Cancer: CentRIC+, School of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is widely acknowledged that social network support plays an important role in the quality of life and illness management of breast cancer survivors. However, the factors and processes that enable and sustain such support are less well understood. This paper reports baseline findings from a prospective UK national cohort of 1,202 women with breast cancer (aged <50 years at diagnosis), recruited before starting treatment, conducted in 2016-2019. Descriptive, univariate and multivariate regression analyses explored associations between the individual, and network member characteristics, and the type of support provided. Social network members provided a substantial level of illness-related, practical and emotional support. Highest contribution was provided by friends, followed by close family members. The social network members of women who did not have a partner provided a higher level of support than those in networks with a partner. Women without higher education were more reliant on close family members than those with higher education, and this was more so for women without a partner. Women with higher education without a partner were more reliant on friends and were overall best supported. Women without higher education who did not have a partner were overall least well supported. They had much smaller networks, were highly reliant on close family members, and on high level contributions from all network members. There is a need to develop network-based interventions to support people with a cancer diagnosis, prioritising support for the groups identified as most at risk. Interventions that support engagement with existing network members during treatment, and those that help extend such networks after treatment, are likely to be of benefit. A network perspective can help to develop tailored support and interventions by recognising the interactions between network and individual level processes.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsSelf-ManagementFemaleHumansProspective StudiesQuality of LifeSocial NetworkingSocial Support

Identifiers

PMID37053231
PMCPMC10101384

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.