Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37053151›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

Extracting relevant predictive variables for COVID-19 severity prognosis: An exhaustive comparison of feature selection techniques.

Miren Hayet-Otero, Fernando García-García, Dae-Jin Lee, Joaquín Martínez-Minaya, Pedro Pablo España Yandiola, Isabel Urrutia Landa, Mónica Nieves Ermecheo, José María Quintana, Rosario Menéndez, Antoni Torres and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Miren Hayet-OteroBasque Center for Applied Mathematics (BCAM), Bilbao, Basque Country, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-6382-9743
Fernando García-GarcíaBasque Center for Applied Mathematics (BCAM), Bilbao, Basque Country, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-6605-9038
Dae-Jin LeeBasque Center for Applied Mathematics (BCAM), Bilbao, Basque Country, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-8995-8535
Joaquín Martínez-MinayaDepartment of Applied Statistics and Operational Research, and Quality, Universitat Politècnica de València (UPV), Valencia, Valencian Community, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-1016-8734
Pedro Pablo España YandiolaRespiratory Service, Galdakao-Usansolo University Hospital, Galdakao, Basque Country, Spain.
Isabel Urrutia LandaBioCruces Bizkaia Health Research Institute, Barakaldo, Basque Country, Spain.
Mónica Nieves ErmecheoBioCruces Bizkaia Health Research Institute, Barakaldo, Basque Country, Spain.
José María QuintanaResearch Unit, Galdakao-Usansolo University Hospital, Galdakao, Basque Country, Spain.
Rosario MenéndezPneumology Department, La Fe University and Polytechnic Hospital, Valencia, Valencian Community, Spain.
Antoni TorresPneumology Department, Hospital Clínic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain.
Rafael Zalacain JorgePneumology Service, Cruces University Hospital, Barakaldo, Basque Country, Spain.
Inmaculada ArosteguiBasque Center for Applied Mathematics (BCAM), Bilbao, Basque Country, Spain.
with the COVID-19 & Air Pollution Working Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the COVID-19 pandemic having caused unprecedented numbers of infections and deaths, large research efforts have been undertaken to increase our understanding of the disease and the factors which determine diverse clinical evolutions. Here we focused on a fully data-driven exploration regarding which factors (clinical or otherwise) were most informative for SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia severity prediction via machine learning (ML). In particular, feature selection techniques (FS), designed to reduce the dimensionality of data, allowed us to characterize which of our variables were the most useful for ML prognosis. We conducted a multi-centre clinical study, enrolling n = 1548 patients hospitalized due to SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia: where 792, 238, and 598 patients experienced low, medium and high-severity evolutions, respectively. Up to 106 patient-specific clinical variables were collected at admission, although 14 of them had to be discarded for containing ⩾60% missing values. Alongside 7 socioeconomic attributes and 32 exposures to air pollution (chronic and acute), these became d = 148 features after variable encoding. We addressed this ordinal classification problem both as a ML classification and regression task. Two imputation techniques for missing data were explored, along with a total of 166 unique FS algorithm configurations: 46 filters, 100 wrappers and 20 embeddeds. Of these, 21 setups achieved satisfactory bootstrap stability (⩾0.70) with reasonable computation times: 16 filters, 2 wrappers, and 3 embeddeds. The subsets of features selected by each technique showed modest Jaccard similarities across them. However, they consistently pointed out the importance of certain explanatory variables. Namely: patient's C-reactive protein (CRP), pneumonia severity index (PSI), respiratory rate (RR) and oxygen levels -saturation Sp O2, quotients Sp O2/RR and arterial Sat O2/Fi O2-, the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) -to certain extent, also neutrophil and lymphocyte counts separately-, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), and procalcitonin (PCT) levels in blood. A remarkable agreement has been found a posteriori between our strategy and independent clinical research works investigating risk factors for COVID-19 severity. Hence, these findings stress the suitability of this type of fully data-driven approaches for knowledge extraction, as a complementary to clinical perspectives.

Indexed as

COVID-19PneumoniaHumansPandemicsPrognosisRetrospective StudiesSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID37053151
PMCPMC10101453

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.