Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37052957›Full record

ArticleGenetics2023

Dispersal inference from population genetic variation using a convolutional neural network.

Chris C R Smith, Silas Tittes, Peter L Ralph, Andrew D Kern

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Coalescence and translation: A language model for population genetics.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Digital Image Processing to Detect Adaptive Evolution.Molecular biology and evolution · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Computational Genomics and Its Applications to Anthropological Questions.American journal of biological anthropology · 2024
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Patterns of Gene Flow inEvolutionary applications · 2024
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Chris C R SmithInstitute of Ecology and Evolution, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6470-3413
Silas TittesInstitute of Ecology and Evolution, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4697-7434
Peter L RalphInstitute of Ecology and Evolution, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9459-6866
Andrew D KernInstitute of Ecology and Evolution, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4381-4680

Funding

Deep learning for population geneticsR01HG010774 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF OREGON · PI ANDREW D KERN · 2020 to 2026
$3.2M
Deep learning for spatial population geneticsF32GM146484 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF OREGON · PI SMITH, CHRIS C · 2022 to 2023
$122k
NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG010774NIGMS NIH HHS F32 GM146484NIH HHS F32GM146484
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The geographic nature of biological dispersal shapes patterns of genetic variation over landscapes, making it possible to infer properties of dispersal from genetic variation data. Here, we present an inference tool that uses geographically distributed genotype data in combination with a convolutional neural network to estimate a critical population parameter: the mean per-generation dispersal distance. Using extensive simulation, we show that our deep learning approach is competitive with or outperforms state-of-the-art methods, particularly at small sample sizes. In addition, we evaluate varying nuisance parameters during training-including population density, demographic history, habitat size, and sampling area-and show that this strategy is effective for estimating dispersal distance when other model parameters are unknown. Whereas competing methods depend on information about local population density or accurate inference of identity-by-descent tracts, our method uses only single-nucleotide-polymorphism data and the spatial scale of sampling as input. Strikingly, and unlike other methods, our method does not use the geographic coordinates of the genotyped individuals. These features make our method, which we call "disperseNN," a potentially valuable new tool for estimating dispersal distance in nonmodel systems with whole genome data or reduced representation data. We apply disperseNN to 12 different species with publicly available data, yielding reasonable estimates for most species. Importantly, our method estimated consistently larger dispersal distances than mark-recapture calculations in the same species, which may be due to the limited geographic sampling area covered by some mark-recapture studies. Thus genetic tools like ours complement direct methods for improving our understanding of dispersal.

Indexed as

EcosystemGenetics, PopulationComputer SimulationGenetic VariationHumansNeural Networks, ComputerPopulation Densitydeep learningdispersalmachine learningpopulation genomicsspace

Identifiers

PMID37052957
PMCPMC10213498

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.