Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37052862›Full record

ArticleAnimal cognition2023

Pet dogs (Canis familiaris) re-engage humans after joint activity.

Molly Byrne, Daniel J Horschler, Mark Schmitt, Angie M Johnston

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animal cognition, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Molly ByrneDepartment of Psychology, Boston College, 140 Commonwealth Ave., Chestnut Hill, MA, 02467, USA. byrnemx@bc.edu.
Daniel J HorschlerDepartment of Psychology, Yale University, 2 Hillhouse Ave, New Haven, CT, 06511, USA.
Mark SchmittDepartment of Psychology, Boston College, 140 Commonwealth Ave., Chestnut Hill, MA, 02467, USA.
Angie M JohnstonDepartment of Psychology, Boston College, 140 Commonwealth Ave., Chestnut Hill, MA, 02467, USA.
Boston College · USYale University · US

Funding

National Science Foundation SBE Postdoctoral Research Fellowship 2104589
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Joint intentionality, the mutual understanding of shared goals or actions to partake in a common task, is considered an essential building block of theory of mind in humans. Domesticated dogs are unusually adept at comprehending human social cues and cooperating with humans, making it possible that they possess behavioral signatures of joint intentionality in interactions with humans. Horschler and colleagues (Anim Behav 183: 159-168, 2022) examined joint intentionality in a service dog population, finding that upon interruption of a joint experience, dogs preferentially re-engaged their former partner over a passive bystander, a behavior argued to be a signature of joint intentionality in human children. In the current study, we aimed to replicate and extend these results in pet dogs. One familiar person played with the dog and then abruptly stopped. We examined if dogs would preferentially re-engage the player instead of a familiar bystander who was also present. Consistent with the findings of Horschler and colleagues (Anim Behav 183: 159-168, 2022), pet dogs preferentially gazed toward and offered the toy to the player significantly more than the familiar bystander. However, no difference was observed in physical contact. These findings provide preliminary evidence for behavioral signatures of joint intentionality in pet dogs, but future work is needed to understand whether this phenomenon extends to other contexts.

Indexed as

CuesHuman-Animal BondAnimalsBehavior, AnimalDogsHumansCanine cognitionCooperationShared intentionalitySocial cognitionTheory of mind

Identifiers

PMID37052862
PMCPMC10345045
OpenAlexW4365443783

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.