Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37052806›Full record

ArticlePhysical and engineering sciences in medicine2023

Gumbel distribution-based technique enables quantitative comparison between streak metal artifacts of multidetector row CT and cone-beam CT: a phantom study.

Yoshikazu Nomura, Hiroshi Watanabe, Hiroshi Tomisato, Sakurako Kawashima, Masahiko Miura

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Physical and engineering sciences in medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. A robust index for metal artifact quantification in computed tomography.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yoshikazu NomuraDepartment of Dental Radiology and Radiation Oncology, Graduate School, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, 1-5-45, Yushima, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8549, Japan. ynmr.orad@tmd.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3654-913X
Hiroshi WatanabeDepartment of Dental Radiology and Radiation Oncology, Graduate School, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, 1-5-45, Yushima, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8549, Japan.
Hiroshi TomisatoRadiology Center, Division of Integrated Facilities, Tokyo Medical and Dental University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Sakurako KawashimaDepartment of Dental Radiology and Radiation Oncology, Graduate School, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, 1-5-45, Yushima, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8549, Japan.
Masahiko MiuraDepartment of Dental Radiology and Radiation Oncology, Graduate School, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, 1-5-45, Yushima, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8549, Japan.
Tokyo Medical and Dental University · JPTokyo Medical and Dental University Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT), derived from multidetector row CT (MDCT), has a high spatial resolution and has recently been applied to various organs. One of the severe limitations common to CBCT and MDCT is metal artifacts. In particular, streak metal artifacts (SMAs) between multiple metal materials often hinder diagnosis. However, no studies have quantitatively compared the strength of SMAs in MDCT and CBCT. Nomura et al. reported an evaluation method specialized in SMAs of CBCT using the Gumbel distribution (GD), which can also be applied to SMAs of MDCT (Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 131: 494-502, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1016/J.OOOO.2020.08.031 ). This study aimed to quantitatively compare SMAs occurring between titanium materials on MDCT and CBCT images using the GD-based method. The SMAs were investigated as follows: A hydroxyapatite block was sandwiched between two titanium rods to generate an SMA. They were placed in an acrylic phantom, simulating a human head, and scanned using an MDCT scanner and two CBCT scanners. The obtained images were analyzed using Gumbel plots and location parameters, and the SMA strength was calculated. The results showed that the SMAs on the MDCT images were significantly weaker than those on the CBCT images. In the CBCT scans, a smaller volume CT dose index value caused stronger SMAs. These results indicate that MDCT is more advantageous than CBCT in terms of SMA reduction when bone morphology between titanium materials must be evaluated. The characteristic should be considered in clinical cases.

Indexed as

ArtifactsTitaniumCone-Beam Computed TomographyHumansMultidetector Computed TomographyPhantoms, ImagingTitaniumCBCTCTGumbel distributionMDCTMetal artifact

Identifiers

PMID37052806
OpenAlexW4365443085

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.