Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37052752›Full record

ArticleBrazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology]2023

Seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 in hospital workers in the southern region of Minas Gerais state in Brazil: An analysis of the pre-vaccine period.

Duillio Alves Caixeta, Mariana Araujo Vieira do Carmo, Flávio Guimarães da Fonseca, Denismar Alves Nogueira, Luiz Felipe Leomil Coelho, Luiz Cosme Cotta Malaquias

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology], 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Duillio Alves CaixetaUniversidade Federal de Alfenas, Alfenas, MG, Brazil.
Mariana Araujo Vieira do CarmoUniversidade Federal de Alfenas, Alfenas, MG, Brazil.
Flávio Guimarães da FonsecaUniversidade Federal de Alfenas, Alfenas, MG, Brazil.
Denismar Alves NogueiraUniversidade Federal de Alfenas, Alfenas, MG, Brazil.
Luiz Felipe Leomil CoelhoUniversidade Federal de Alfenas, Alfenas, MG, Brazil.
Luiz Cosme Cotta MalaquiasUniversidade Federal de Alfenas, Alfenas, MG, Brazil. luiz.malaquias@unifal-mg.edu.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4920-072X
Universidade Federal de Alfenas · BRUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection seroprevalence can be performed by detecting anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. The survey is essential to understand the disease transmission's dynamic in the studied population. This study aimed to carry out a seroepidemiological survey of SARS-CoV-2 in three hospitals located in the south of Minas Gerais state, Brazil. 859 samples were collected from August to December 2020 when SARS-CoV-2 vaccines were still not available and Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) were performed on participants sera. The average age of participants was 38 years, and most were women (71.4%). Likewise, most participants were classified as health professionals with direct or indirect contact with patients with COVID-19 (74.5%). The other participants tested belonged to other sectors, such as the administrative one (11,6%). Considering clinical symptoms, 15.8% of participants reported diarrhoea, 6.4% fever, 5.8% respiratory distress, and 7.0% loss of smell and taste. Many participants reported contact with infected patients (63.35%). Regarding the ELISA tests, 21.6% of the participants had positive results and hospital 3 had the highest positivity (21.7%), followed by hospital 2 (21.6%) and hospital 1 (20.3%). The prevalence was higher in women compared to men (22,8% and 18,7%, respectively). Regarding the area of expertise, the highest positivity (20.9%) was observed among health professionals. However, professionals who worked exclusively with COVID-19 had lower positivity when compared to professionals who did not work directly with COVID-19 (22.0% and 21.5%, respectively). When analysing the correlation between the ELISA tests with the other variables, a significant association was detected with these previous serological variables, previous contact with COVID-19 and the presence of fever symptoms, loss of smell and taste. Clinical symptoms associated with serological tests are important tools for monitoring the disease among health professionals.

Indexed as

COVID-19SARS-CoV-2AdultAnosmiaAntibodies, ViralBrazilCOVID-19 VaccinesFemaleHealth PersonnelHospitalsHumansMaleSeroepidemiologic StudiesAntibodies, ViralCOVID-19 VaccinesCOVID-19ELISAHospitalsSARS-CoV-2Seroepidemiology

Identifiers

PMID37052752
PMCPMC10099019
OpenAlexW4365443686

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.