Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37052726›Full record

ArticleExperimental & applied acarology2023

Evaluation of the in vitro acaricidal effect of five organic compounds on the cattle fever tick Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus (Acari: Ixodidae).

Adela S Oliva Chávez, Stephanie Guzman Valencia, Geoffrey E Lynn, Charluz Arocho Rosario, Donald B Thomas, Tammi L Johnson

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental & applied acarology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Insects · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Adela S Oliva ChávezDepartment of Entomology, Texas A&M University, 77845, College Station, TX, USA. aolivachavez@tamu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2397-0846
Stephanie Guzman ValenciaDepartment of Entomology, Texas A&M University, 77845, College Station, TX, USA.
Geoffrey E LynnTexas A&M AgriLife Research, 78801, Uvalde, TX, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7095-0912
Charluz Arocho RosarioDepartment of Entomology, Texas A&M University, 77845, College Station, TX, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5454-0924
Donald B ThomasCattle Fever Tick Research Laboratory, USDA-ARS, 78541, Edinburg, TX, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0373-2656
Tammi L JohnsonTexas A&M AgriLife Research, 78801, Uvalde, TX, USA. tammi.johnson@ag.tamu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0752-0012
Agricultural Research Service · USTexas A&M University · USTexas A&M University System · US

Funding

Agricultural Research Service 58-3094-9-013National Institute of Food and Agriculture TEX0-9902U.S. Department of Agriculture Hatch Project #1019784
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The cattle fever tick, Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus, is the most economically important tick worldwide. Infestations with this tick can lead to direct damage and cattle mortality due to the transmission of potentially deadly pathogens. Management of this tick species has been focused on the use of synthetical acaricides; however, the emergence of acaricide resistance to single or multiple active ingredients has resulted in a need for novel acaricide compounds. Among potential avenues for the discovery of novel acaricides are plant-derived compounds. The efficacy of five organic compounds (nootkatone, Stop the Bites®, BioUD®, lavender oil, and cedarwood oil) was evaluated using larval immersion tests (LITs), repellency assays, and adult immersion tests (AITs). The results from the LITs indicate that three of the organic compounds (NootkaShield™, Stop the Bites, BioUD) led to significant mortalities at low concentrations (0.2, 0.02, and 0.08%, respectively). By comparison, lavender and cedar oil led to around 90% mortality at 10 and 1% concentrations, respectively. Similarly, NootkaShield, Stop the Bites, and BioUD had strong repellent properties with over 90% repellency at the two highest concentrations tested. Using the FAO 2004 guidelines, we evaluated the effectiveness of these organic compounds at reducing the fecundity of R. (B.) microplus and show that Nootkatone, Stop the Bites, and BioUD may significantly decrease tick populations (Drummond's index > 90% at concentrations of 5%), highlighting their potential as alternatives to synthetic acaricides for the control of cattle fever ticks.

Indexed as

AcaricidesCattle DiseasesIxodidaeRhipicephalusTick InfestationsAnimalsCattleKetonesLarvaPolycyclic SesquiterpenesAcaricidesKetonesnootkatonePolycyclic Sesquiterpenesundecan-2-oneAcaricidePlant-derived compoundsRepellentTick managementTicks

Identifiers

PMID37052726
PMCPMC10167096
OpenAlexW4365442804

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.