Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37052721›Full record

SynthesisSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2023

Demoralization and spirituality in oncology: an integrative systematic review.

Ana Cláudia Mesquita Garcia, Milena Schneiders, Kárita Santos da Mota, Vander Monteiro da Conceição, David W Kissane

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Spiritual needs, spiritual well-being and related factors among patients with gynecologic cancer: A cross-sectional study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  3. Characteristics and influencing factors of demoralization in ovarian cancer: a latent profile analysis.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Demoralization: A concept analysis through a scoping review methodology.International journal of nursing studies advances · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Demoralization in breast cancer survivors.Frontiers in psychology · 2025
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Ana Cláudia Mesquita GarciaInterdisciplinary Center for Studies in Palliative Care, School of Nursing, Federal University of Alfenas (UNIFAL-MG), Gabriel Monteiro da Silva Street, 700, Centro, Alfenas, MG, 37130-001, Brazil. ana.mesquita@unifal-mg.edu.br.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9793-7905
Milena SchneidersInterdisciplinary Center for Studies in Palliative Care, School of Nursing, Federal University of Alfenas (UNIFAL-MG), Gabriel Monteiro da Silva Street, 700, Centro, Alfenas, MG, 37130-001, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7471-7886
Kárita Santos da MotaInterdisciplinary Center for Studies in Palliative Care, School of Nursing, Federal University of Alfenas (UNIFAL-MG), Gabriel Monteiro da Silva Street, 700, Centro, Alfenas, MG, 37130-001, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8862-4891
Vander Monteiro da ConceiçãoInterdisciplinary Center for Studies in Palliative Care, School of Nursing, Federal University of Alfenas (UNIFAL-MG), Gabriel Monteiro da Silva Street, 700, Centro, Alfenas, MG, 37130-001, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0972-0795
David W KissaneUniversity of Notre Dame, Sydney, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5930-4573
Universidade Federal de Alfenas · BRSt Vincent's Hospital Sydney · AUUniversidade de São Paulo · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo synthesize the scientific findings on demoralization and spirituality in the oncology context.

methodsThis is an integrative systematic review, in line with the PRISMA 2020 guidelines, as proposed by Whittemore and Knalf (2005). The MEDLINE via PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, APA PsycNet, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and LILACS databases were searched without limitations regarding language or year of publication. The studies were screened for inclusion according to the predefined eligibility criteria. Data extraction and evidence quality assessment were performed.

resultsOut of the 1587 articles evaluated, 10 studies were included in this review. In general, it was found that demoralization tends to increase with the proximity of death and seems to be inversely related to spirituality, with spiritual well-being being a protective factor against demoralization, while the non-fulfillment of spiritual needs is related to increased demoralization in people with cancer. Furthermore, even among caregivers of people with advanced cancer, demoralization seems to be associated, among other factors, with spiritual suffering. These results should be analyzed with caution, considering that the studies included in this review are all observational studies, which prevents establishing cause and effect relationships.

conclusionsDemoralization tends to increase with growing frailty and the proximity of death in people with cancer, and it seems to be inversely related to spirituality, both in these patients and in their caregivers.

Indexed as

DemoralizationNeoplasmsSpiritualityHumansCancerDemoralizationExistential distressSpirituality

Identifiers

PMID37052721
OpenAlexW4365442944

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.