Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37052655›Full record

ReviewHistochemistry and cell biology2023

Big data in contemporary electron microscopy: challenges and opportunities in data transfer, compute and management.

David Poger, Lisa Yen, Filip Braet

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Histochemistry and cell biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. In focus: data management and data analysis in microscopy.Histochemistry and cell biology · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

David PogerMicroscopy Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia. david.poger@sydney.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8794-5688
Lisa YenMicroscopy Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8394-1708
Filip BraetAustralian Centre for Microscopy and Microanalysis, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5222-0895

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The second decade of the twenty-first century witnessed a new challenge in the handling of microscopy data. Big data, data deluge, large data, data compliance, data analytics, data integrity, data interoperability, data retention and data lifecycle are terms that have introduced themselves to the electron microscopy sciences. This is largely attributed to the booming development of new microscopy hardware tools. As a result, large digital image files with an average size of one terabyte within one single acquisition session is not uncommon nowadays, especially in the field of cryogenic electron microscopy. This brings along numerous challenges in data transfer, compute and management. In this review, we will discuss in detail the current state of international knowledge on big data in contemporary electron microscopy and how big data can be transferred, computed and managed efficiently and sustainably. Workflows, solutions, approaches and suggestions will be provided, with the example of the latest experiences in Australia. Finally, important principles such as data integrity, data lifetime and the FAIR and CARE principles will be considered.

Indexed as

Big DataMicroscopy, ElectronBest practicesFAIR and CARE principlesMetadata standardsMicroscopy facilityVirtual research environmentWorkflow optimisation

Identifiers

PMID37052655
PMCPMC10492738

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.