ReviewAnnals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England2024
Bladder ultrasonography in the assessment of cauda equina syndrome in the emergency department: a literature review.
Review in Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cauda equina syndrome: a structured approach for the higher orthopaedic examination.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
For cauda equina syndrome (CES), current clinical assessment in the emergency department usually involves perianal sensation (PAS) and anal tone (AT). Neither reliably predict magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) demonstrating a large central disc prolapse (MRI+). Other clinical examination findings increase the probability of MRI+. Other tests of sacral nerve root function include anal squeeze (AS) and the bulbocavernosus reflex (BCR). If BCR, PAS and AT, and AS are combined and they are all normal, CES can be excluded in almost all cases. Portable bladder ultrasonography is now commonly used to assess bladder function, particularly in measuring the post-void residual urinary volume (PVR). PVR is deemed normal at <50ml. If the PVR is <200ml and there are no objective signs, MRI+ is rare. If the PVR is >200ml, MRI+ is found in 43% of cases. The combined assessment of PAS, AT and AS (and BCR in selected cases) and PVR increases the specificity and sensitivity of a clinical diagnosis of CES (i.e. maximising MRI+ and minimising MRI-). Recommendations for when to perform MRI are made.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.