ArticleJournal of veterinary internal medicine
Effects of 2 modes of positive pressure ventilation on respiratory mechanics and gas exchange in foals.
Article in Journal of veterinary internal medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Jet ventilation dynamics in rigid bronchoscope: insights from a simulated experimental model.BMC anesthesiology · 2025Article
- The Use of Bi-Nasal Prongs for Delivery of Non-Invasive Ventilation to Foals.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024Article
- Effects of 2 modes of positive pressure ventilation on respiratory mechanics and gas exchange in foals.Journal of veterinary internal medicineArticle
- Use of prototype bi-nasal prongs for noninvasive ventilation in foals.Journal of veterinary internal medicineArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundContinuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) and pressure support ventilation (PSV) can improve respiratory mechanics and gas exchange, but different airway pressures have not been compared in foals. HYPOTHESIS/
objectivesAssess the effect of different airway pressures during CPAP and PSV have on respiratory function in healthy foals with pharmacologically induced respiratory insufficiency. We hypothesized that increased airway pressures would improve respiratory mechanics and increased positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) would be associated with hypercapnia. ANIMALS: Six healthy foals from a university teaching herd.
methodsA prospective, 2-phase, 2-treatment, randomized cross-over study design was used to evaluate sequential interventions in sedated foals using 2 protocols (CPAP and PSV). Outcome measures included arterial blood gases, spirometry, volumetric capnography, lung volume and aeration assessed using computed tomography (CT).
resultsSedation and dorsal recumbency were associated with significant reductions in arterial oxygen pressure (PaO CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: Both CPAP and PSV improved lung mechanics and gas exchange in healthy foals with induced respiratory insufficiency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.