Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37051716›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied research in intellectual disabilities : JARID2023

Current services and outcomes of formerly institutionalised and never-institutionalised US adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities: A propensity score matching analysis.

Roger J Stancliffe, Renáta Tichá, Sandra L Pettingell, James Houseworth, Julie Bershadsky

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied research in intellectual disabilities : JARID, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Social Inclusion of Adults with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities: Toward Belonging.International review of research in developmental disabilities · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Roger J StancliffeInstitute on Community Integration, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4265-7433
Renáta TicháInstitute on Community Integration, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6431-5261
Sandra L PettingellInstitute on Community Integration, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6329-8834
James HouseworthInstitute on Community Integration, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9214-5247
Julie BershadskyInstitute on Community Integration, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, USA.

Funding

ACL HHS 90RTCP0003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDeinstitutionalization research shows better services and outcomes relative to institutional life but has not compared formerly institutionalised and never-institutionalised service users.

methodsWe used propensity score matching (PSM) to match formerly institutionalised and never-institutionalised participants on six personal characteristics. Data came from the 2018 to 2019 National Core Indicators In-Person Survey. We excluded current institution residents, and states with 25% + of missing data on former institutionalisation.

resultsOverall, 15.5% of participants in the 29-state full sample had lived in an institution for 1 year or more. Findings from the PSM sample showed that former-institution residents were more likely to use congregate living arrangements and less likely to live with family. They experienced more loneliness, less support-related choice, and had a consistent pattern of disability service-focused social connections.

conclusionsMany former institution residents remain disadvantaged relative to matched peers. There is a need to identify factors to enhance services and outcomes following deinstitutionalization.

Indexed as

Community IntegrationCommunity SupportDeinstitutionalizationDevelopmental DisabilitiesIntellectual DisabilityPropensity ScoreAdultAgedEmployment, SupportedFemaleFriendsHome EnvironmentHumansLonelinessMaleMiddle Agedcommunity livingdeinstitutionalizationformerly institutionalizedintellectual disabilitynever institutionalizedpropensity score matching

Identifiers

PMID37051716
PMCPMC10247480

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.