Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37051692›Full record

ArticleHuman brain mapping2023

Every individual makes a difference: A trinity derived from linking individual brain morphometry, connectivity and mentalising ability.

Zhaoning Li, Qunxi Dong, Bin Hu, Haiyan Wu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human brain mapping, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Zhaoning LiCentre for Cognitive and Brain Sciences and Department of Psychology, University of Macau, Taipa, China.ORCID 0000-0002-7578-3076
Qunxi DongSchool of Medical Technology, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0002-0484-3019
Bin HuSchool of Medical Technology, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0003-3514-5413
Haiyan WuCentre for Cognitive and Brain Sciences and Department of Psychology, University of Macau, Taipa, China.ORCID 0000-0001-8869-6636

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mentalising ability, indexed as the ability to understand others' beliefs, feelings, intentions, thoughts and traits, is a pivotal and fundamental component of human social cognition. However, considering the multifaceted nature of mentalising ability, little research has focused on characterising individual differences in different mentalising components. And even less research has been devoted to investigating how the variance in the structural and functional patterns of the amygdala and hippocampus, two vital subcortical regions of the "social brain", are related to inter-individual variability in mentalising ability. Here, as a first step toward filling these gaps, we exploited inter-subject representational similarity analysis (IS-RSA) to assess relationships between amygdala and hippocampal morphometry (surface-based multivariate morphometry statistics, MMS), connectivity (resting-state functional connectivity, rs-FC) and mentalising ability (interactive mentalisation questionnaire [IMQ] scores) across the participants (

Indexed as

AmygdalaBrainHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingRegression Analysisdyadic regression analysisinteractive mentalisation questionnaireinter-subject representational similarity analysismentalisingresting-state functional connectivitysurface-based multivariate morphometry statistics

Identifiers

PMID37051692
PMCPMC10171537

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.