Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37051456›Full record

ArticleCampbell systematic reviews2021

Health, social care and technological interventions to improve functional ability of older adults living at home: An evidence and gap map.

Vivian Welch, Christine M Mathew, Panteha Babelmorad, Yanfei Li, Elizabeth T Ghogomu, Johan Borg, Monserrat Conde, Elizabeth Kristjansson, Anne Lyddiatt, Sue Marcus and 13 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Campbell systematic reviews, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
19.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors at 13 institutions in 8 countries.

Vivian WelchMethods Centre Bruyère Research Institute Ottawa Canada.
Christine M MathewBruyère Research Institute University of Ottawa Ottawa Canada.
Panteha BabelmoradUniversity of Ottawa Ottawa Canada.
Yanfei LiEvidence-Based Social Science Research Center, School of Public Health Lanzhou University Lanzhou China.
Elizabeth T GhogomuBruyère Research Institute University of Ottawa Ottawa Canada.
Johan BorgLund University Malmo Sweden.
Monserrat CondeCochrane Campbell Global Ageing Partnership Field Faro Portugal.
Elizabeth KristjanssonFaculty of Social Sciences, School of Psychology University of Ottawa Ottawa Canada.
Anne LyddiattIndependent Consultant Ingersoll Canada.
Sue MarcusRadcliffe Department of Medicine University of Oxford Oxford UK.
Jason W NickersonInstitute of Population Health Ottawa Canada.
Kevin PottieFamily Medicine University of Ottawa Ottawa Canada.
Morwenna RogersNIHR ARC, South West Peninsula (PenARC) University of Exeter Medical School Exeter UK.
Ritu SadanaWorld Health Organization Geneva Switzerland.
Ashrita SaranCampbell Collaboration Delhi India.
Beverly SheaBruyère Research Institute University of Ottawa Ottawa Canada.
Lisa SheehyBruyère Research Institute University of Ottawa Ottawa Canada.
Heidi SveistrupBruyère Research Institute University of Ottawa Ottawa Canada.
Peter TanuseputroOttawa Hospital Research Institute Ottawa Canada.
Joanna Thompson-CoonNIHR ARC South West Peninsula (PenARC) University of Exeter Medical School Exeter UK.
Peter WalkerFaculty of Medicine University of Ottawa Ottawa Canada.
Wei ZhangAccess to Medicines, Vaccines and Health Products World Health Organization Geneva Switzerland.
Tracey E HoweCity of Glasgow College Glasgow UK.
University of Ottawa · CAUniversity of Exeter · GBWorld Health Organization · CHBruyère · CACampbell Collaboration · INCity of Glasgow College · GBGlobal Water Partnership · GHIngersoll Rand (United States) · USInstitute of Population and Public Health · CALanzhou University · CNMalmö University · SEOttawa Hospital · CAUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: By 2030, the global population of people older than 60 years is expected to be higher than the number of children under 10 years, resulting in major health and social care system implications worldwide. Without a supportive environment, whether social or built, diminished functional ability may arise in older people. Functional ability comprises an individual's intrinsic capacity and people's interaction with their environment enabling them to be and do what they value. Objectives: This evidence and gap map aims to identify primary studies and systematic reviews of health and social support services as well as assistive devices designed to support functional ability among older adults living at home or in other places of residence. Search Methods: We systematically searched from inception to August 2018 in: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, CENTRAL, CINAHL, PsycINFO, AgeLine, Campbell Library, ASSIA, Social Science Citation Index and Social Policy & Practice. We conducted a focused search for grey literature and protocols of studies (e.g., ProQuest Theses and Dissertation Global, conference abstract databases, Help Age, PROSPERO, Cochrane and Campbell libraries and ClinicalTrials.gov). Selection Criteria: Screening and data extraction were performed independently in duplicate according to our intervention and outcome framework. We included completed and on-going systematic reviews and randomized controlled trials of effectiveness on health and social support services provided at home, assistive products and technology for personal indoor and outdoor mobility and transportation as well as design, construction and building products and technology of buildings for private use such as wheelchairs, and ramps. Data Collection and Analysis: We coded interventions and outcomes, and the number of studies that assessed health inequities across equity factors. We mapped outcomes based on the International Classification of Function, Disability and Health (ICF) adapted categories: intrinsic capacities (body function and structures) and functional abilities (activities). We assessed methodological quality of systematic reviews using the AMSTAR II checklist. Main Results: After de-duplication, 10,783 records were screened. The map includes 548 studies (120 systematic reviews and 428 randomized controlled trials). Interventions and outcomes were classified using domains from the International Classification of Function, Disability and Health (ICF) framework. Most systematic reviews ( Authors' Conclusions: There is substantial evidence for interventions to promote functional ability in older adults at home including mostly home-based rehabilitation for older adults and home-based health services for disease prevention. Remotely delivered home-based services are of greater importance to policy-makers and practitioners in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. This map of studies published prior to the pandemic provides an initial resource to identify relevant home-based services which may be of interest for policy-makers and practitioners, such as home-based rehabilitation and social support, although these interventions would likely require further adaptation for online delivery during the COVID-19 pandemic. There is a need to strengthen assessment of social support and mobility interventions and outcomes related to making decisions, building relationships, financial security, and communication in future studies. More studies are needed to assess LMIC contexts and health equity issues.

Identifiers

PMID37051456
PMCPMC8988637
OpenAlexW3183137864

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.