Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37051407›Full record

ArticlePediatric quality & safety

Determinants of Blood Culture Use in Critically Ill Children: A Multicenter Qualitative Study.

Charlotte Z Woods-Hill, Maria N Nelson, Whitney Eriksen, Katharine A Rendle, Rinad S Beidas, Christopher P Bonafide, Michelle R Brajcich, Aaron M Milstone, Judy A Shea

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric quality & safety. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Charlotte Z Woods-HillDivision of Critical Care Medicine, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pa.
Maria N NelsonUniversity of Pennsylvania Mixed Methods Research Laboratory.
Whitney EriksenThomas Jefferson Medical Group.
Katharine A RendlePerelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa.
Rinad S BeidasNorthwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine.
Christopher P BonafideSection of Pediatric Hospital Medicine, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Michelle R BrajcichDivision of Critical Care Medicine, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pa.
Aaron M MilstoneDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Pediatrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md.
Judy A SheaPerelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa.
University of Pennsylvania · USChildren's Hospital of Philadelphia · US

Funding

Leveraging implementation and behavioral science to reduce harmful overuse of diagnostic testing in critically ill childrenK23HL151381 · NHLBI · CHILDREN'S HOSP OF PHILADELPHIA · PI WOODS-HILL, CHARLOTTE Z · 2021 to 2025
$890k
NHLBI NIH HHS K23 HL151381
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Blood cultures are fundamental in diagnosing and treating sepsis in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU), but practices vary widely. Overuse can lead to false positive results and unnecessary antibiotics. Specific factors underlying decisions about blood culture use and overuse are unknown. Therefore, we aimed to identify perceived determinants of blood culture use in the PICU. Methods: We conducted semistructured interviews of clinicians (M.D., D.O., R.N., N.P., P.A.) from 6 PICUs who had participated in a quality improvement collaborative about blood culture practices. We developed interview questions by combining elements of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research and behavioral economics. We conducted telephone interviews, open-coded the transcripts, and used modified content analysis to determine key themes and mapped themes to elements of Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research and behavioral economics. Results: We reached thematic saturation in 24 interviews. Seven core themes emerged across 3 Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research domains: individual characteristics [personal belief in the importance of blood cultures, the perception that blood cultures are a low-risk test]; inner setting [adherence to site-specific usual practices, site-specific overall approach to PICU care (collaborative versus hierarchical), influence of non-PICU clinicians on blood culture decisions]; and outer setting [patient-specific risk factors, sepsis guidelines]. In addition, outcome bias, default bias, and loss aversion emerged as salient behavioral economics concepts. Conclusions: Determinants of blood culture use include individual clinician characteristics, inner setting, and outer setting, as well as default bias, outcome bias, and loss aversion. These determinants will now inform the development of candidate strategies to optimize culture practices.

Identifiers

PMID37051407
PMCPMC10085482
OpenAlexW4362736948

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.