ArticlePediatric quality & safety
Recognizing Nonaccidental Trauma in a Pediatric Tertiary Hospital: A Quality Improvement Imperative.
Article in Pediatric quality & safety. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Improving the evaluation of non-accidental trauma across multiple specialties at a single institution.BMJ open quality · 2025Article
- Hasn't Child Abuse Been Overlooked? An Evaluation of Abused Children Who Visited the Emergency Department with Sentinel Injuries.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Timely Recognition of Abusive Injuries (TRAIN): Results from a Statewide Quality Improvement Collaborative.Pediatric quality & safetyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Abusive injuries can go unrecognized or improperly managed by medical providers. This study sought to standardize the nonaccidental trauma (NAT) workup and improve NAT evaluation completion for children <7 months with concerning injuries in the pediatric emergency department (PED) and inpatient settings at an urban, tertiary care children's hospital. Methods: The quality improvement (QI) team created hospital guidelines for suspected NAT, including age-based recommendations (care bundle). The team embedded an order for NAT evaluation into the electronic health record (EHR). The QI team provided education on child abuse identification and evaluation across the hospital. Hospital providers received written guides focused on enhancing communication with families. Outcome measures included monthly NAT bundle use and cases between incomplete bundles in children with suspicious injuries. Chart review of incomplete bundles helped accurately identify patients who needed NAT bundles and improved accurate NAT bundle completion for appropriate patients. Results: Appropriate NAT bundle completion increased from 31% during the baseline period in January 2019 to 100% in April 2020 and remained at 100% for the remainder of the study period, ending June 2021. The number of patients between missed bundles was 11 from August 2019 until March 2020, when it increased to 583. There were no missed bundles from March 2020 through June 2021. Conclusions: Standardizing NAT evaluation and creating a NAT care bundle to facilitate the appropriate evaluation preceded an increase in appropriate bundle completion in patients <7 months old with possible NAT in the PED and inpatient units.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.