Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37051341›Full record

ReviewFood science & nutrition2023

The effect of a low versus high sodium diet on blood pressure in diabetic patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials.

Mahsa Gholizadeh-Moghaddam, Farnaz Shahdadian, Fatemeh Shirani, Amir Hadi, Cain C T Clark, Mohammad Hossein Rouhani

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Food science & nutrition, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Protective Effect ofFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mahsa Gholizadeh-MoghaddamNutrition and Food Security Research Center Department of Community Nutrition School of Nutrition and Food Science Isfahan University of Medical Sciences Isfahan Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5539-8250
Farnaz ShahdadianNutrition and Food Security Research Center Department of Clinical Nutrition School of Nutrition and Food Science Isfahan University of Medical Sciences Isfahan Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1146-2369
Fatemeh ShiraniIsfahan Endocrine and Metabolism Research Center Isfahan University of Medical Sciences Isfahan Iran.
Amir HadiHalal Research Center of IRI, Food and Drug Administration Ministry of Health and Medical Education Tehran Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9952-6579
Cain C T ClarkCentre for Intelligent Healthcare Coventry University Coventry UK.
Mohammad Hossein RouhaniNutrition and Food Security Research Center Department of Community Nutrition School of Nutrition and Food Science Isfahan University of Medical Sciences Isfahan Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2451-0083

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There have been numerous clinical trials that have investigated the effect of sodium intake on blood pressure in diabetic patients. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the clinical trial studies performed on the effect of low sodium diet (LSD) versus high sodium diet (HSD) on blood pressure in diabetic patients. PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were systematically searched from database inception to July 10, 2021. Both type 1 and 2 diabetes was considered. Overall, there were 15 studies included in this meta-analysis. The weighted (WMD) mean difference with 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated using a random-effects model. Risk of bias in the studies was assessed based on the Cochrane collaboration tool and the quality of all the studies was considered as good. Overall, LSD significantly reduced SBP (systolic blood pressure) (WMD: -3.79 mmHg, 95% CI: -6.02, -1.56) and DBP (diastolic blood pressure) (WMD: -1.62 mmHg, 95% CI: -2.84, -0.40), in comparison with HSD, in diabetics. However, LSD had no significant effect on MAP (mean arterial pressure) in comparison with HSD (WMD: -1.81, 95%CI: -5.49, 1.87). Although subgroup analysis could not attenuate heterogeneity in SBP, subgroup analysis in DBP based on duration (≤1 week: WMD: -2.35, 95%CI: -3.69, -1.00,

Indexed as

blood pressurediabetesmeta‐analysissodiumsystematic review

Identifiers

PMID37051341
PMCPMC10084959

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.