Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37051331›Full record

ArticleNeuro-oncology advances

Automated tumor segmentation and brain tissue extraction from multiparametric MRI of pediatric brain tumors: A multi-institutional study.

Anahita Fathi Kazerooni, Sherjeel Arif, Rachel Madhogarhia, Nastaran Khalili, Debanjan Haldar, Sina Bagheri, Ariana M Familiar, Hannah Anderson, Shuvanjan Haldar, Wenxin Tu and 13 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuro-oncology advances. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
11.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Anahita Fathi KazerooniCenter for Data-Driven Discovery in Biomedicine (D3b), Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7131-2261
Sherjeel ArifCenter for Data-Driven Discovery in Biomedicine (D3b), Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Rachel MadhogarhiaCenter for Data-Driven Discovery in Biomedicine (D3b), Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Nastaran KhaliliCenter for Data-Driven Discovery in Biomedicine (D3b), Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Debanjan HaldarCenter for Data-Driven Discovery in Biomedicine (D3b), Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Sina BagheriCenter for Data-Driven Discovery in Biomedicine (D3b), Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Ariana M FamiliarCenter for Data-Driven Discovery in Biomedicine (D3b), Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Hannah AndersonCenter for Data-Driven Discovery in Biomedicine (D3b), Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Shuvanjan HaldarDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
Wenxin TuCollege of Arts and Sciences, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Meen Chul KimCenter for Data-Driven Discovery in Biomedicine (D3b), Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Karthik ViswanathanCenter for Data-Driven Discovery in Biomedicine (D3b), Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Sabine MullerDepartment of Neurology and Pediatrics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Michael PradosDepartment of Neurological Surgery and Pediatrics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Cassie KlineDivision of Oncology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Lorenna VidalDivision of Radiology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Mariam AboianDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Phillip B StormCenter for Data-Driven Discovery in Biomedicine (D3b), Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Adam C ResnickCenter for Data-Driven Discovery in Biomedicine (D3b), Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Jeffrey B WareDepartment of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Arastoo VossoughCenter for Data-Driven Discovery in Biomedicine (D3b), Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Christos DavatzikosAI2D Center for AI and Data Science for Integrated Diagnostics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1025-8561
Ali NabavizadehCenter for Data-Driven Discovery in Biomedicine (D3b), Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0380-4552
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · USRutgers, The State University of New Jersey · USUniversity of the Sciences · USYale University · US

Funding

User-ready tools and scalable workflows for INCLUDE datasets in the cloud: advancing brain imaging data management and analyticsU2CHL156291 · NHLBI · CHILDREN'S HOSP OF PHILADELPHIA · PI Joaquin M. Espinosa · 2020 to 2026
$43.8M
NRSA Training CoreTL1TR001880 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI MEAGHER, EMMA ANNE · 2016 to 2025
$10.0M
NCATS NIH HHS TL1 TR001880NHLBI NIH HHS U2C HL156291
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Brain tumors are the most common solid tumors and the leading cause of cancer-related death among all childhood cancers. Tumor segmentation is essential in surgical and treatment planning, and response assessment and monitoring. However, manual segmentation is time-consuming and has high interoperator variability. We present a multi-institutional deep learning-based method for automated brain extraction and segmentation of pediatric brain tumors based on multi-parametric MRI scans. Methods: Multi-parametric scans (T1w, T1w-CE, T2, and T2-FLAIR) of 244 pediatric patients ( Results: Dice similarity score (median ± SD) was 0.91 ± 0.10/0.88 ± 0.16 for the whole tumor, 0.73 ± 0.27/0.84 ± 0.29 for ET, 0.79 ± 19/0.74 ± 0.27 for union of all non-enhancing components (i.e., NET, CC, ED), and 0.98 ± 0.02 for brain tissue in both internal/external test sets. Conclusions: Our proposed automated brain extraction and tumor subregion segmentation models demonstrated accurate performance on segmentation of the brain tissue and whole tumor regions in pediatric brain tumors and can facilitate detection of abnormal regions for further clinical measurements.

Indexed as

deep learningmagnetic resonance imagingpediatric brain tumorskull-strippingtumor segmentation

Identifiers

PMID37051331
PMCPMC10084501
OpenAlexW4327574677

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.