Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37051247›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in immunology2023

The serum IgG antibody level as a biomarker for clinical outcome in patients with cerebral sparganosis after treatment.

Haijie Xiang, Jie Wang, Dandan Tan, Ying Xiong, Pengcheng Huang, Yu Shen, Yun Xu, Zhihong Gong, Fei Hu, Chunhua Xu and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The clinical, neuroradiological, and pathological features of cerebral sparganosis in Jiangxi Province, China.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Haijie XiangDepartment of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Jie WangDepartment of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Dandan TanDepartment of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Ying XiongDepartment of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Pengcheng HuangDepartment of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Yu ShenDepartment of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Yun XuClinical Department, Jiangxi Provincial Institute of Parasitic Disease, Nanchang, China.
Zhihong GongClinical Department, Jiangxi Provincial Institute of Parasitic Disease, Nanchang, China.
Fei HuClinical Department, Jiangxi Provincial Institute of Parasitic Disease, Nanchang, China.
Chunhua XuDepartment of Neurosurgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Jie WuDepartment of Neurosurgery, Guangdong 999 Brain Hospital, Guangzhou, China.
Wei LiuDepartment of Outpatient, The Nanchang City First Hospital, Nanchang, China.
Junpu LiuClinical Department, Jiangxi Provincial Institute of Parasitic Disease, Nanchang, China.
Hui WanDepartment of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Daojun HongDepartment of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Huiqun XieClinical Department, Jiangxi Provincial Institute of Parasitic Disease, Nanchang, China.
First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University · CNJiangsu Institute of Parasitic Diseases · CNNanchang University · CNGuangdong 999 Brain Hospital · CNThird Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Cerebral sparganosis is a rare parasitic infection of the brain tissue. The remission of MRI change and clinical symptom has been used to evaluate the therapeutic effect. However, there is no study to correlate the serum IgG antibody level of sparganum to the prognosis of disease after treatment. Methods: 87 patients with cerebral sparganosis were collected from three medical centers. Clinical symptoms and MRI changes were evaluated at 12 months after initial treatment, and serum IgG antibody level of sparganum was evaluated at 2, 6, and 12 months after treatment. The positive cut-off value was based on 2.1 times the optical density (OD) of negative control. The index value was defined as the sample OD divided by the cut-off value. Results: Among the 87 patients after treatment, 71 patients had good clinical outcomes, and 16 had poor clinical outcomes. The area under the curve (AUC) showed that the index value measured at 12 months after treatment had the best prediction effect, with a value of 2.014. In the good-outcome group, the index values were less than 2.014 in all 71 patients, and only 8 patients had mildly enhanced residual lesions on MRI. In the poor-outcome group, the index values were more than 2.014 in all 16 patients, and all patients still showed significantly enhanced lesions on MRI. Compared with poor-outcome patients, only 2 patients with good outcomes had disease recurrence after treatment. Discussion: This study provided evidence that the serum IgG antibody level of sparganum was a promising biomarker to evaluate the prognosis of patients with cerebral sparganosis after treatment.

Indexed as

SparganosisAnimalsBiomarkersHumansImmunoglobulin GMagnetic Resonance ImagingSparganumBiomarkersImmunoglobulin Gcerebral sparganosisclinical outcomeIgG antibodypraziquantelsurgery

Identifiers

PMID37051247
PMCPMC10083495
OpenAlexW4361010957

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.