Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37051067›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2023

Amplified sinus-P-wave analysis predicts outcomes of cryoballoon ablation in patients with persistent and long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation: A multicentre study.

Antonio Creta, Sandrine Venier, Konstantinos Tampakis, Rui Providencia, Juno Sunny, Pascal Defaye, Mark J Earley, Malcolm Finlay, Ross J Hunter, Pier D Lambiase and 17 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

27 authors at 7 institutions in 5 countries.

Antonio CretaBarts Heart Centre, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Sandrine VenierDepartment of Cardiology, Grenoble University Hospital and Grenoble Alpes University, Grenoble, France.
Konstantinos TampakisElectrophysiology & Pacing Department, Henry Dunant Hospital Center, Athens, Greece.
Rui ProvidenciaBarts Heart Centre, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Juno SunnyBarts Heart Centre, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Pascal DefayeDepartment of Cardiology, Grenoble University Hospital and Grenoble Alpes University, Grenoble, France.
Mark J EarleyBarts Heart Centre, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Malcolm FinlayBarts Heart Centre, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Ross J HunterBarts Heart Centre, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Pier D LambiaseBarts Heart Centre, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Nikolaos PapageorgiouBarts Heart Centre, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Richard J SchillingBarts Heart Centre, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Simon SportonBarts Heart Centre, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
George AndrikopoulosElectrophysiology & Pacing Department, Henry Dunant Hospital Center, Athens, Greece.
Elodie DeschampsDepartment of Cardiology, Grenoble University Hospital and Grenoble Alpes University, Grenoble, France.
Jean-Paul AlbenqueDépartement de Rythmologie, Clinique Pasteur, Toulose, France.
Christèle CardinDépartement de Rythmologie, Clinique Pasteur, Toulose, France.
Nicolas CombesDépartement de Rythmologie, Clinique Pasteur, Toulose, France.
Stéphane CombesDépartement de Rythmologie, Clinique Pasteur, Toulose, France.
Xavier VinolasArrhythmia Unit, Department of Cardiology, Hospital Universitario Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain.
Zoraida Moreno-WeidmannArrhythmia Unit, Department of Cardiology, Hospital Universitario Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain.
Taiyuan HuangDepartment of Cardiology and Angiology, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany.
Martin EichenlaubDepartment of Cardiology and Angiology, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany.
Björn Müller-EdenbornDepartment of Cardiology and Angiology, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany.
Thomas ArentzDepartment of Cardiology and Angiology, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany.
Amir S JadidiDepartment of Cardiology and Angiology, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany.
Serge BovedaDépartement de Rythmologie, Clinique Pasteur, Toulose, France.
St Bartholomew's Hospital · GBClinique Pasteur · FRUniversity of Freiburg · DEHenry Dunant Hospital · GRHospital de Sant Pau · ESUniversité Grenoble Alpes · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Grenoble · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Outcomes of catheter ablation for non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) remain suboptimal. Non-invasive stratification of patients based on the presence of atrial cardiomyopathy (ACM) could allow to identify the best responders to pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). Methods: Observational multicentre retrospective study in patients undergoing cryoballoon-PVI for non-paroxysmal AF. The duration of amplified P-wave (APW) was measured from a digitally recorded 12-lead electrocardiogram during the procedure. If patients were in AF, direct-current cardioversion was performed to allow APW measurement in sinus rhythm. An APW cut-off of 150 ms was used to identify patients with significant ACM. We assessed freedom from arrhythmia recurrence at long-term follow-up in patients with APW ≥ 150 ms vs. APW < 150 ms. Results: We included 295 patients (mean age 62.3 ± 10.6), of whom 193 (65.4%) suffered from persistent AF and the remaining 102 (34.6%) from long-standing persistent AF. One-hundred-forty-two patients (50.2%) experienced arrhythmia recurrence during a mean follow-up of 793 ± 604 days. Patients with APW ≥ 150 ms had a significantly higher recurrence rate post ablation compared to those with APW < 150 ms (57.0% vs. 41.6%; log-rank Conclusion: APW duration predicts arrhythmia recurrence post cryoballoon-PVI in persistent and long-standing persistent AF. An APW cut-off of 150 ms allows to identify patients with significant ACM who have worse outcomes post PVI. Analysis of APW represents an easy, non-invasive and highly reproducible diagnostic tool which allows to identify patients who are the most likely to benefit from PVI-only approach.

Indexed as

arrhythmogenic substrateatrial cardiomyopathyatrial fibrillation ablation outcomescryoballoonfibrosisinteratrial blocklow voltageP-wave duration

Identifiers

PMID37051067
PMCPMC10083273
OpenAlexW4360984896

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.