ArticleCampbell systematic reviews2021
PROTOCOL: What are the effects of different elements of media on radicalization outcomes? A systematic review.
Article in Campbell systematic reviews, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Protocol: Deterrence-Oriented Counterterrorism Interventions in OECD Countries for Domestic Terrorist Attacks: A Systematic Review.Campbell systematic reviews · 2026Review
- What are the effects of different elements of media on radicalization outcomes? A systematic review.Campbell systematic reviews · 2022Review
- Getting evidence into use: The experience of the Campbell Collaboration.Campbell systematic reviews · 2022Article
- PROTOCOL: What are the effects of different elements of media on radicalization outcomes? A systematic review.Campbell systematic reviews · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: In this systematic review and meta analysis we will collate and synthesize the evidence on media-effects for radicalization, focusing on both cognitive and behavioral outcomes. The goal is to identify the relative magnitudes of the effects for different mediums, types of content, and elements of human-media relationships. Methodology: Random-effects meta analysis will be used and the results will be rank-ordered according to the size of the pooled estimates for the different factors. Meta-regressions, moderator analysis, and sub-group analyses will be used to investigate sources of heterogeneity. Implications: The results of this review will provide a better understanding of the relative magnitude of the effects of media-related factors. This information should help the development of more evidence-based policies.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.