ReviewFrontiers in pharmacology2023
Real-world disparities and ethical considerations with access to CFTR modulator drugs: Mind the gap!
Review in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
36 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.
- An Observational Cohort Study of Targeted Antibiotic Treatments of Cystic Fibrosis Exacerbations.Open forum infectious diseases · 2026Trial
- Long-term effectiveness and safety of cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator modulators and their impact on the lives of people with cystic fibrosis.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2026Article
- Nucleic acid-based therapies for people with cystic fibrosis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2026Article
- Perspective of the European Cystic Fibrosis Society on Improving Global Cystic Fibrosis Care.Pediatric pulmonology · 2026Article
- Evolving Cystic Fibrosis Therapy: The Good, the Sad, and the Hopeful.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Considerations for early life genetic therapies in cystic fibrosis.American journal of physiology. Lung cellular and molecular physiology · 2026Review
- Psychological impact of genetic eligibility for CFTR modulator therapy in children with cystic fibrosis and their parents.European journal of pediatrics · 2026Article
- Patient-Derived Intestinal Organoids in the Global Cystic Fibrosis Landscape.Pediatric pulmonology · 2026Review
- Disparities in Access to Cystic Fibrosis Therapy Across Countries.Pediatric pulmonology · 2026Review
- Cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator modulator therapy and lived experiences in South Africa: A mixed-methods study.The South African journal of physiotherapy · 2026Article
- Bioethical challenges in the implementation of targeted anti-tumor therapies in low-resource settings: a perspective from Latin America.Exploration of targeted anti-tumor therapy · 2026Review
- Building Lay Society Knowledge and Education for Health Technology Assessment and Policy Engagement: Case of CFTR Modulator Access in Brazil.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- The globalization of cystic fibrosis care.Current opinion in pediatrics · 2025Review
- Article
- Progress of personalized medicine of cystic fibrosis in the times of efficient CFTR modulators.Molecular and cellular pediatrics · 2025Review
- Recent developments in cystic fibrosis drug discovery: where are we today?Expert opinion on drug discovery · 2025Review
- Review
- ERS Congress 2024: highlights from the Respiratory Infections Assembly.ERJ open research · 2025Article
- ERS Congress 2024: highlights from the Paediatrics Assembly.ERJ open research · 2025Article
- Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Cystic Fibrosis Receiving CFTR Modulators: A Comparison of Childhood Versus Adolescent Initiation.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The third Sustainable Development Goal (SDG), to ensure healthy lives and promote well-being for all at all ages, has particular relevance and implementation challenges amongst people living with rare diseases such as cystic fibrosis (CF). Although the treatment and projected outcome of CF has significantly improved with the advent of CF transmembrane conductance regulator protein modulator (CFTRm) therapy, there remains significant global inequality with regards to access to these life-saving and life-altering drugs. Elexacaftor, tezacaftor, and ivacaftor (ETI) triple combination therapy, first licensed in the United States in 2019, has rapidly become the standard of care for children aged 6 years and older in most high-income countries for individuals with CFTR variants responsive to ETI. Negotiated agreements for access to ETI are currently in place in North America,Europe, Israel ,Australia and New Zealand. However, less priority has been given to negotiate agreements for access to CFTRm in low-middle income countries(LMIC) with significant CF populations such as Central and South America, India, the Middle East, and Southern Africa. These countries and individuals living with CF are therefore effectively being left behind, in direct conflict with the stated principle of the 2030 SDGs. In this review, we highlight the current global inequity in access to CFTRm drugs and its impact on widening disparities between high-income countries and LMIC in CF outcomes and survival. We further discuss the reasons for this inequity and explore the ethical- and human rights-based principles and dilemmas that clinicians, families, governments, and healthcare funders must consider when prioritizing fair and affordable access to expensive CFTRm drugs. Lastly, we propose possible solutions to overcoming the barriers to accessing affordable CFTRm drugs in LMIC and illustrate with examples how access to drug therapies for other conditions have been successfully negotiated in LMIC through innovative partnerships between governments and pharmaceutical industries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.